@Christoph-Hart yay 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@Christoph-Hart damn thats weird, thanks

@dannytaurus yeah I think we put that in place after some spam bots start using porn pics as profile.

@trillbilly Thank you this is probably what I was looking for!

okay thanks im gonna watch now

@Christoph-Hart I missed your reply here - thank you very much for taking the time to answer this. Let me know if you'd like me to hit up Steinberg about the "Important Parameters".

oh yes i just got it, thanks David!!

@ally said in Pan issue in Waveform Generator:

@Lindon It's doable. 6 might be a little much voice count wise with unison voices coming from the synth group melting your cpu...

oh I didnt mean it wasnt do able - just not int the customised way proposed...

@HISEnberg haha I think the „under construction“ was just a passive aggressive hint from Dominik for me to take a look at it because he couldn‘t figure out how to use the method.

There‘s nothing „under construction“ there, it definitely worked at some point but I haven‘t used the method for quite some time. I‘ll take a look later.

@ally Don't forget that you can trim that voice count to reduce the memory overhead!

@orange Yeah I removed that because it was super glitchy.

@Lindon thank you very much! this worked for me.

I did not know that i had to follow this practice, on the internet i couldn't find this solution.

But again thank you and i hope some other people will see this

@harris-rosendahl I haven't opened the project for a while but I think I've changed it to just regular RR's with individual samples, see this thread:

https://forum.hise.audio/topic/9403/neatbrain-writeup?_=1727086798982

which has a bit more info about the full process 🙂

the main technique is calculating the length of a full cycle and using that as the parameters for Sample Looping, from there you can just make use of the Sampler as normal (RRs, groups etc) and don't have to think about all the experimental crap I was doing here

@Lindon since I do backups of my project from early stages to the latest I found that 3 versions earlier something happened, not sure, but I could export an earlier version today, lots of work lost but at least I know I can still export, thanx for all the help and for this new tool to test the plug ins

@Christoph-Hart Thanks!!

@d-healey said in same envelope on multiple parameters:

@Morphoice Global modulation container

..but remember this is one envelope to rule them all - so no local polyphonic triggering for sound sources...

@FatMitchell
Would you rather I did a tutorial on snex, or on c++ nodes?

C++ is more complex but allows you to do some really complex DSP not possible in snex.

Depends what you are wanting it for.

@aaronventure brilliant thank you. that worked