Feature Request
@Christoph-Hart - Please can we have bus effects (send and receive) as per this discussion :
https://forum.hise.audio/topic/1983/feature-request-the-case-for-bus-containers
-- wow I just re-read the thread I pointed to - I've been a pita about this .....sorry.
@MikeB -- Lindon, Hull UK, Audio Developer, before that I worked in Telecommunications (real time and all that - not as complicated as it sounds) and before that I was a record producer....before that I was a starving/failing musician.
Feature Request
MIDI out.
So I've seen a few posts here asking how to "do" an LED-style control, and there's been a few answers - all of which seemed to require adding in a png for the LED itself.
So as I needed (or wanted) one of these that used vector drawing, and one that had some level of "red-line" warning as well as momentary peak measurement too I coded one up. You might want to use it - or adapt it to your needs.
So caveat no.1 : as @ustk has said elsewhere - this is not really a gain meter - its approximates one as it uses 100 milliseconds between each measure - so it may miss some peaks. But in any case:
HiseSnippet 2093.3oc2Y0uaajaDeks2qwJmARJtCs+IQPAtUWTj2Uw1IFF2EYaI6Hb9CAKmjVTbHfdWJIhrhTXWJ63FXf9H1Gg9HbuA2MjbWsbkWaqSsIMoBIVlbFN727AmYHcmHtOINlGYUZ4SubDwpzWa28RlXvtCvTlU6lVktm8QjKNnUSqctbDNNlDXUpzh6KoVZ4krTe9kWrCNDy7IYSYY8ZN0mb.cHUjMamF+DMLbOb.4T5PCtWqQaeNaWdHeLfjEscsFg8eGtO4HrjsErsJ8UsBnBdTWAVPhsJszN7fK6NfeASy+qowzyBIxAdVcAAomdOdXfDwxYs1c.MLnSpFGaYUxtSl9unV++F6CoAzIymYGdfh.JaEl1iRKbavyyDdtyN7JY.ukzv6g1c8iniDYTjX691sYBRTOL3BLgklWqErtu8tbfCln1P76H6EAClrBmMbcqhV20sxVqTdkxqtJxmObHmghHi.kWPY8QQ7wv2DIcvQEKPmiiPur8As2+kmt6wGb7qNA8CH22+7MWq9NdMWaKS11Y6c+ICd1au5pO43oUy8akimMTexwCDCty1mbZ6CaA73UeZZcjXkDAz5Ml4KnblS+JqT9CqTFgj+GA5SeTHnEfSJRrkdtUW0GG5iNCjQrbZzSPjyIQWhDP.JRLfFif+EP60iDAVuLAAqPIGX+jbUqOQ7RBs+.gSEPFNNdttnGOgzqwgiINUp78Rf5Kpjr6oX.Q6gnhXDFM.DAnDmK4GVMlgBwfNJQSsZIaOvrR9OdZoi9QT17AXAt1.phVkJ5U9A8WIaZDYHY3YvtoTyb6LlE.jiIvNOfnLZnzXgIvP94Z6jg4HAUaUD2RItKeLSZ9bS33pIVi2QHi.aguhAdOEFXiUPUNBrEwnK.2DJHBeAaBD0qufM4wOt.68EjuahDnBzPdThAWKNHuE3GSrAbEefUgbQlKnHs4GMhRqbWJtWAnRt4ZWPlKgGowKhQHARvDQ5A.a.51wxO.6Pg98gXw.ez3QRQI2OYvuZOqNkeOFxnA6nhVlDlbDBTgzSAaMOgDWQBiI4g13Xh4Nqh8UVA047aDF20IvbmEl5L3UxjZ4bCJesDE8fhU.JNCpE0Gx.xBzrzuljv1ggNYo1prUgRP6JAqT5JASqtLmStrmofQK5SH9Bm+ta0Tqa0T86Mz.w.mJUmVeeRJm+70xrLAJR6UtTHYFPHsg1lf9djmaAIKLws9q3ZWLfJH2jqrnE.NzJ4Op2ulDcG.3vAp.MsRl4gy8q0Mynj56LUTnTULMffHA8IW2rmUoIylKWZpM2sp2FUqud8etJxqVRIwqT+Lo3X6ifTgLRX9ZgsYxVhfPQU2SR0nETx.D4izTdjVRYKX6wATdaFX2OfzSFCmVftuDpCGwYv.mGkmMkTJRFmHiClAgn3SIk7BVZfTEPOQWn2IqfZdlUB3N3NeYYeItlZ2LBcWENldc3LU9imLMSZXTLWS4XNpizaci1lD5JaRxuKUOY+oQ6hCCkG9clzQQZCEHz0se5jasX8kGzfMoIwmdFbtXOdjLBXOrOjTyQGNn.w3nH.BG.ExBcfScowiEXr+ORzdEIZEnSZvy4l1YS5vQ1blH4gQkQRlmsRhYO0Ng3ri3BxwfAq7GJub4qJillTudERS5jh3PZ2nBIq2waYgN59Dppy7NgQn+47MnaeyMnad+AecLiAibVaFUb7HB6lZa2JIPC9sW0tIDhJ6jOYNfuQjHAUBgRMImCWQR2W+x1MIwuSvGo3MI5DZrWnntRZW+RauEMPxehmv58StF0+7sMtL6NUNMtPlHcxDMNsw.0YtL9iabFOJfD0k9OHl2lSO6I3.53XyqzAI7GldIsu19od0qu4lart2yLHTeJJBx6E4VxyV+oaT+oqAWpyPMKeSp4CryGxZnsvkFMz1WzXDVFxaHzLSTdCgk60LD7F4wYcuMe1y8Vu9lqa86yBYMKJ0Csm5floVs+miZ00uGJbaXdv3PrH+UjkIfRH.GKycWT48MYwTwkl63Gk6MOqv8g1cnB+AEi2EJ.uvA4O13M4UHVwV29PFXWxdu+579jCE+hHt20SNbuIuHDc3nPx9YuHjtRys7hPVVMIg3blt2jOb8u0nf2LpMCt6snCODGMsgew7Z6hyl1VfFtzLGcn5n6Kln4+nsxj+kDfUgDe4.3GXCId+L.t5tt6eHVDQgJG1GMdXWHEuOAfJCpLHauozBxhQ5wtxwR.0kvBTC9U3SBQO43RID8RIZZR9VsI491uAeNQc8Fk03aUi6wiFh1mvHQRak2sjR3eMqOR7nY9QhO1W.P3zHLKdDOl3YJ4onUOetIwXVd10SkiKo5AMXOzfu60Hcx5lSBgE4DFLNmjNjZTf+e+hVLL3z6R.sI33XePYk1Ny3lNigqSqNc3YtvroqaN8KwQAfew+1xW96t5PgOH8W8Y86k+oqMkEmM3VfEbgNW6u3xCRpu1BJ9EBWOXR17d3wghzYyez5PNiOZ.mQy4zOg.YD52mjKVpPEZag.tWa1LeSiSHgDbrwws+RC4Cyfi.6DYNsE2Qk3Ryn+5OaqgKRlO3yqxE+AMrKa+ZvI4K2ccpwzgnIpi2ci1WESNEqfyzcDIWjYtJ0s+y6Xtduoysi4+J8Ou3+G0+7GiTPPMgub574OYC0opiTtaz+682eJZ.5SwdLD6Gwequ9kqjYDumZFPuYp+t2KaenbLxyR8ZVv5rcq4ZMDpq9VeeYL8S.6Swqo9brlmNGqYs4XMqOGqYi4XMOaNVyyu00HaoY6wB9Pc7OLQmVpm3qTIcWcpiBV+FfT1+WL
I'm pretty sure the code could do with re-factoring so I'm always interested in a better version if you want to comment or contribute...
OK so as promised, here I am at the end of the "name your Own Price" sale... to provide a few stats.
So the sale ran from 27 June to 5th August ( so a little over a month) and I did spend a modest amount of time pushing it on VI-Control, KVR and facebook.
Referrer order:
All up I had 169 orders for 469 products. Yep still got a lot of multiple-product orders. For an all up revenue of $2658.05 (who was that person who paid $5.05 for something?). As you can guess more than 90% of people paid the minimum $5.00 for each product - so if you are going down this path then make sure your minimum is something you can live with. I know most people who run these say most customers pay way above the minimum, but frankly I'm unsurprised given the audience here is musicians - never found them to be the most generous of individuals (sorry if that offend anyone - remember I'm a musician too...)
My take: As a vehicle for getting product into peoples hands its a good approach, many many customers were very grateful I ran this and said so in public forums, but as a sustainable business model its never going to fly. To do this you need a fairly extensive (and pretty played out) back catalogue- which is what I had/have so it was minimal pain for me.
OK thats it have at it..
Hello everyone, so right now I'm running a different kind of summer sale over at Channel Robot. It's "Name Your Own Price" (min = $5 , max = list price). It's for my Kontakt instruments ONLY - and I'm pretty sure no one here needs or wants any of those but on one of the facebook groups I was asked to provide some feedback on how it went after the sale finishes. It occurred to me that this would be useful information to all of us - in case you were thinking of running with this format for your own product sets. So whenits finished I will try and remember to post some stats here.
Meanwhile - it's been running for 1.5 days now, so this is whats happened so far:
In the last 36 hours I've made 26 sales - selling 82 items (yep almost no one is picking up a single item..) for a total revenue of $429.00 - yes almost everyone (90%) are paying the minimum $5.00.
I am getting the feeling that if I'd set the minimum at $10 I wouldnt be so much down on sales and up a fair bit on revenue - but who knows. I will try and keep you posted - remind me at the end of August in case I forget.
but unfortunately I'm a graphic designer for 40 years
.. So just askin..... would you expect someone who has never done Graphic Design to pick it up in " a couple of weeks"? To be competent enough to charge for their services?
Coding take years of effort to learn how to do. I think its unreasonable to expect it wont take as long to be good at it as it takes to be good in any other profession.
I've been writing code for over 30 years...(ouch!), and I knew the day I started on HISE development I wouldn't be making anything of any value for at least 6 months - and so it proved.
Perhaps divide and conquer is your best approach - find someone who will build the back end for you and you (graphic) design the front end.
Me personally - I'm just here for all the free advice about cash-app transfers in those very helpful posts...
** FEATURE REQUEST **
@d-healey said in Waveform Generator Sync 2nd Osc:
HiseSnippet 1080.3oc4WssiaSDFdbx5UMojJJpUvkVq3hrRkUwg1EjPnlt4PIpMah1rz16plc7eRFs1yXYOdgnpJwSGWyi.OB7F.+iOr1YqUHXNTAjqx+oY99OOdVfjAggx.hQiyW6CDiOvb9ZgZU+UTtfLd.w3NlSngJHvJg0Iq8oggfCwvn9S0LLZrGI92u73SntTACxYQHuPxYvy4dbUN2Y8dF20cD0ANm6UP6G1aLSJ5KckQHdpa1g3SYWRWBmR0pUyjXr+PGtRFLWQUPHwXuSjNqmuR9chD8eAOjegKnIrIywCJg8HoqiFw5+S5uh65LKyuCIDCyY4Qg5IQg6YNg6vuledz3CiEXkaQw3gQssAO6JBOiBvauD3cWy4r.tuJWhFa21br.STKnXJnHrRzkT6GML6KQMDpi7nWBiBPhqsn8wc57.qG0oygeUqlsZhIhPk0Uz.qWRuBVHC7dJHf.J5c1VesUbMxQKAULbioZePllV4pdPxo0pIW3xEf0hHASwkBKo3jHkRJr0HJP51lI87kBDaO.uU2H3vVMeSqlMd2a+nPP8DkJfeQjBZaebl93E813KKyG0nK6PaeP50cvgZ6Suz9TW2KvRr12DM5Cq.TOUpfoh1G17MMaz7sMstonEKJUV5g4BAkJVW7GrMCaKh7t.BxbvLEwpfMKy1e2JyXIwkBJJEiEb0TeHkNuPztjBQRZfE+22Nd.UQ00lo7P87g.EWCGiAvUXSeRkZCyAP3kJoertoYCrkSEK8No0wIQeB2QaPZpf78WOY3GdVu04DS6EhEEiEyB.LUpKvIuaGB1mJchb0ULEad0SrREfg5M5RzcBhPtZcwIZ+A5n6TZGcoAxcDt20bFWwVUNdqUBdwDxe23Mc9XKygKV.LUNX2ybzqp5vvpAk6m.kaapmQDOBJFH22rj4PaYs0Osqqs7240VSYJDBmGPEg9xPvt3IeCYcKJa.nhDapdBqMzR6diP2qfd2pWFytEYNiJ13vP5MNoI77dLxO+3gBJlPlCn23LMjgNqN1UrcXVjaH7RtiZkcQCyY2sH6ugFnWMv1ngpdkVQtYeaA8KYe49uGVm+Wey+e9YU02M3967hiFYXbN2y2EFJtBbwY8wX7ivg6KnQtpLta1mMQJj9qjBNqXQ2Y.t6d4RXiBqRcHbKOtbNmy85cF3BzvB8deZumiOqfFfwInhwB6cOVrs70mXl.WK8vAq+ario9+62wr8NTb94+dxzerINSuqUb5158e99LYjhKVNghSCvsPlmF4MGWfx.DwBA3hWjoQM8qNSn6no0vYNHbhI9U7WpPaMsQpP6Lg+ibGdTVf70rjWrqGXbqXNneKh+p0F3mOizV1j3Wwi1Y14nNDObsyqYLcM8mgwmxsoaEr4yqfMOrB17nJXywUvlunB17ka0F8F+mDojdI0+HiYCi+bFCijW.E2JP9MvUryX5
..ah, sneaky... thanks.
@Lindon -- looking in the C++ code in Synth.cpp it seems to be there as a param
ModulatorSynth::restoreFromValueTree(v);
loadAttribute(OctaveTranspose1, "OctaveTranspose1");
loadAttribute(OctaveTranspose2, "OctaveTranspose2");
loadAttribute(Detune1, "Detune1");
loadAttribute(Detune2, "Detune2");
loadAttribute(WaveForm1, "WaveForm1");
loadAttribute(WaveForm2, "WaveForm2");
loadAttribute(Pan1, "Pan1");
loadAttribute(Pan2, "Pan2");
loadAttribute(Mix, "Mix");
loadAttribute(EnableSecondOscillator, "EnableSecondOscillator");
loadAttribute(PulseWidth1, "PulseWidth1");
loadAttribute(PulseWidth2, "PulseWidth2");
loadAttribute(HardSync, "HardSync");
but its not "set-able"
parameterNames.add("OctaveTranspose1");
parameterNames.add("WaveForm1");
parameterNames.add("Detune1");
parameterNames.add("Pan1");
parameterNames.add("OctaveTranspose2");
parameterNames.add("WaveForm2");
parameterNames.add("Detune2");
parameterNames.add("Pan2");
parameterNames.add("Mix");
parameterNames.add("EnableSecondOscillator");
parameterNames.add("PulseWidth1");
parameterNames.add("PulseWidth2");
any one know the tweak to fix this ?
Is there a param for this? Its not in the documentation I can see......
@DanH use the limiter in the dynamics model...
@d-healey -- er 2 points (possbly both demonstrating my ignorance)
What reverb pan modulator?
Panning the reverb isnt (even if this modulator exists) the point - these are SEND effects,
So 4 voices all sending to send slot 1 (which holds a Reverb)
Voice 1 is panned hard right
Voice 2 is panned 50% right
Voice 3 is panned 30% left
Voice 4 is panned hard left
in the current scenario even if I turn off voice 2, 3 and 4, the output I get from the send slot (in my return) is a mono signal.....of voice 1.(which is a stereo signal by the way)..which is useless I think - or have I completely mis-understood what you are saying ....
Re the "Reverb FX returns mono signal" bug.
I've demonstrated it and I think @d-healey confirmed it, and I've reported it in the bug list, but.....
I'm on a really tight timeframe so before I head off and do this sort of silliness across all 4 send effect slots in my project:
Where I have to duplicate for each channel(left and right) the slots and their gain returns so I get some sort of stereo signal back....
@Christoph-Hart is there any chance of this being fixed soon? If not I will start this work around....
BUG
Simple Reverb FX is sending a mono signal out - even when you put a stereo signal in...
@Christoph-Hart said in Simple Reverb - slot based and not...:
A reverb effect will always create a stereo signal from a mono signal so not sure if this is a bug or a feature.
-- but it s not creating a stereo image - its creating a mono image (same signal in BOTH channels).... which is wrong when the input is different in each channel...
apply some analysis plugin to the output and you see that the output is MONO not stereo...
So if you load the snippet I posted you will see it is doing nearly the exact opposite of what you suggest, it takes a stereo signal (sound in the left and nothing in the right) and makes a MONO signal out of it...left signal + reverb in the left channel and left signal + reverb in the right channel......
actually it might be right signal in the right and right signal in the left but the same principle applies...its silence in one channel , sound in another and a mono signal comes out.. left = right.