@tomekslesicki Call downloadFile again.

Link Preview Image HISE | Docs

favicon

(docs.hise.audio)

Also be aware that if you call this method again with the same URL and parameters, it will not add another download, but just replace the callback in the already pending download. If you call this method with a file that already exists, the method assumes that it's a previously stopped download and resumes the download at the position (delete the file before calling the method if you don't want this behaviour).

@tomekslesicki what you could do in that case is to create a file that contains the server call response, and have the user to check/send you that file

@tomekslesicki said in HEADS UP: Server.downloadFile() issue on macOS Sequoia - and a solution:

maybe it works on some systems but not others, for whatever reason?

That's why we need to find the common factor. Then you can recreate the system in a VM and debug it.

What OS are they using?
What DAW are they using?
Are you able to make a standalone app that just does the download call so that it can be tested in isolation?
Do they have a firewall?
Do they use a VPN?
Who is their internet provider?
What country are they in?
etc.

Find out everything that they have in common and build a VM to match.

@tomekslesicki said in HEADS UP: Server.downloadFile() issue on macOS Sequoia - and a solution:

Is there a way to get the final url of the call affected by the parameter property?

Only on your server I think.

@tomekslesicki Yeah - try it and report back, and don't get stuck in an endless loop of failed downloads, give up after a few attempts.

In my downloader I give up after 1 attempt so I don't have to deal with it ;)

@dannytaurus yes.

@d-healey thank you!

@d-healey that's right, envelopes and other modulators are not processed on the channel level so you get a single modulation signal for every voice so even with polyphonic channel routing you would still be limited by this design.

You'll probably need to look for another way to achieve this, but usually once you apply different modulation sources to voices it's time to duplicate the samplers.

@tomekslesicki Engine.quit()

Thanks so much, that's very helpful, I appreciate it!

Hence the feature request :-) fadeComponent has been working very well for me so far, it would just be great to have a quick and easy way to achieve fades to semi-transparent states like this.

@Christoph-Hart Epic, thank you!

@Christoph-Hart I think the thing is, the mulitmics actually break it. It works fine without multimics.

I found out that if I put NUM_MAX_CHANNELS also in the project settings, everything works just fine... :-)

Thank you for the clues!

@d-healey I knew I was missing something! Thanks again!

Was wondering the same these days!

@Oli-Ullmann great, thank you!

yup, bug, should be fixed now.

@ustk genious, thank you!

@Christoph-Hart ? :-)