@Christoph-Hart It's unrelated to smoothing, the parameter input is static and if I turn off the smoothing it's still the same.

here's a snippet

HiseSnippet 2098.3oc6Z0zSibjFtaaJy.yjumIatrq5CajHRiPXxjuTNfGv.wZiAKLgjbhTzcY6VzcUs5tLCNQ6881lqbIJ+Bh1q6M9Mr43dY+Ivufc22pptcWs61FiGCYPJLRCTu0WOue+VcUsBY1jnHVng4RGNHfXX9HT6ATdus5gcoFMpaX95nl3HNIzRQZyAA3nHhigoY4cEDLWZAC4OWswlXOL0ljRxv3HlqM4Kc8c4oTaU6u354sC1gbnqu1neVsF1L5VLOVe.OkQqYDfsOE2krGVLrRHCyJa63xYgs4XNIxvbgMYNCZ2i8BpZ7G4F4dhGQznpQaXgTj2g44HPrfpwV8b8bZkv2QFFlnVoRgxJoviQMccbGROUZ7lxNrRmgt7vrTV3UNC7ppCu0zfWAPxTCRKnfzagZaG5FvS6QfmGhZPAkSGLH10ghZrFlWh1hACfxW0GeJYmPnwvIrxGu1ZO0B9uO3y6zmZycYTKFcOFmrOckOX4eX4kV9utr0nc0oSg8I1lPlmGIrvtEZ5vIMwUn88OgD9Tqyvd8ICGHv9YkonwKS0U41JtVafLZCpKe+.BcbFBFwhJ3u9pF0wbrPQDSCFW.Ij6JffYcxYfUsRsrDpNI5TNK.rqyoy.qElSeOLOqIjvuItCPFjQuITNzHW9.c+p4lc0zBw2B0xka2qXLVp.LBRpaCLF6M9Zns6zgXySA3Bnc9laIWux4kQKG65A6oXyeTbSqc9lpE5z82PoF3Agj.bH4PVKO7fUhv9AdjC.L9TqS7X1m1186I48JBTPXSwHVwtGlRIdQyhySkoVpTcxJkCX84tztMw7P2yAuv8562FBSaS1JFc.MyRBeHU60DsE1EsITGYi+G7SbmUEsMi6rZRmZte6Q3ufEdpLRX7eaXtnR1GIExG247pFO2yi8hsX9AtwVofNPRqEyaPPOF00VPRMhDj9beVeXShg6WfiND65ILqa2OBBN3rOsMLXYZLyxGQBijK7hn0VE9GXluGyA5pxNXaPvNnEl2S3uHh2.FmjvUsGZjlAq51IhkHIMmRJAPzWv5hjbB8SKbHjyChSKB2TRZSlD9QkbPzB7+Jo1mFQGI50F6YbjvBPLICwtnjfRDiTCsi64e5wRSOiLrv6pwBZiY5g8r.xxCAYIMPtLxm4nDiYf3i0f3vQb6BvToXEM.9GQQ9LFuGw43fDE0w8oQvLAfjAyuuDyfK5pSZJyMlnhHZNIA9uF5KAgENz5.HrigQZ37CwgcIbobGb5nDak2iTIzvQrL1fOiwPqPAsGgNrWHIpWOnXJYpx7SCgvNNYm0hHEVLzrnELQRKXDMcow3MMaRS74iP6pMZyIAhvk5iq8ojWnj25iTHIR13bK8y6yY9P3PYpLCMfTYDf7yWbw+bib.o1eu1H.QNtwCj2.0Vp4gnmxxc0VtZULL9rZSBC2.gwUS.CKg1lhOQXokagLzrqU5uL1ufuH76UEzuAFokzMRyp5MekQ0mkwOIpXFGnO+Y7J2wLtNuVAEPviD7+gf+dHYUYG2.tcgLb6zGd40Qtzf97i4rtcgpOxDv3AJdn5XBw7mlTn2piI1in..Ox4IkzW2MJ.JFay9PQkJUSFJhPoTGx4I0krMTZkCb9Q4zSpUQW0pKcuF78pTtg8XCCLMmUdqOFkWETWQJ6LSoh7zP+d9ghxOH94aeEJ+vHp9BpeTXLmYLyp0aQFji2F4VRrrHpgfWJPnb6aeNLN3zafd6hj0mZjLRHwEQETKe9SLcWUHeoL4Bk04lAYuAxY.E66ZGspry4Y9va6LQlnIaN7sWl2b.T8SS7pK69OdRMk3U6b.ydzyhMNqwltnme2y9w+crw4y4bLbP0QV6F0tC17kPGP7H3HxMd2uJehCiZS2t+y+5+8eEGc5.g0Ul89mt3hmLKILLpcyhL9PTaWGhxw8Zp1raNe+3pM6dC85mPs0yP8B0uVos3ahoXgcKjMeYM0mxBE9t2o9ulHyGVuVdY9j2+4ii+AjHBebGwHS3+w1H6wfTrkJdhHbx7G35S0+hKd+KkeQ+3RSih+.+4qTcxegmhOkwlL1o9X4Ws7k99Cd6jO7b83bQw2bf7lzHgV6GZU2kLxkwwIIUwoIpDjSEvizQbrSMmaA0jfZZ0fJxaEJwVAaQZmEtQocqhWosaocMJR9yZaYA3IVNjCLWsQbOEhj39xy0wcjaizQQS7oj9AErb46vr78oO6tlY2CFdGvth5T1M8NfUDrDTpNt6.15W1c0KqSfxWzEFesqiHneptqfaItA8Lv4nEyCGN50JMuDkxhylt69RvRVuL2O2BS2kOM4qkdZuqt2FIE42m.rzj39CfeSnp5WELHtiCF7DkH4gnuFeFQ9nPjRimHa2gE5asKAN9lPVUcd7rPBl5mEx91b.BGFhoQArH3LxZq7H8stde0I79zrCWQJynDr2N.6oMtGTKg355DAyhLKFzNyJ0TnlRZ9e1PkspMA3Fm8irAlEORo0s56EQjdGU0mXJ400I+E3PGPuXOo3kKLcwKulWHSkaqWHycre7uYO7hLOnmkRvnJo51PxOOn5vgQy6f66wSnl00pIixRtX6Tk9ADHhP2tjrGSqHFZzRedbsBp4QcogxOV7rIKpdiebSEpudu3y1aIhGb+IcwDe7LkmpGOybGuy9Co4N1CEBYd+QS+GPPX70sjpaqe6022E0GbWrG9X6P1wwWmfHfwCjT.9lJeHnKgZJZaU03rQ+v.9PpmissytT4l35y5D+vYchOaVm3GMqS7im0I9Iy5D+zqehhJCh+rYB+DnBoVaq9X1lCOJuYYi+O9pxrwB

While making this, I wanted to add an input toggle so you can toggle between the two to compare more easily without having to drag cables, but then the weirdest thing: input toggle had both at the same value.

I also tried plugging peak into an add node, and it's, again, reporting the same correct value.

It's only plugging the peak directly into the gain node that causes issues. Plugging it into any other node first that can then send that to a modulation target results in the correct value in the gain node.

So the peak -> gain interaction is weird.

It's not just display, the 400db gain in the screenshots above is FUCKING REAL. I have the limiter in the snippet, too.

EDIT: I updated the snippet to have the smoother and correct value plugged into gain. DO NOT disable the limiter on the master FX if you don't have one on your system.

The peak node interacts with the min and max and skew properties of the gain knob in the gain node, instead acting as a factor, where first converting it the actual value using smoothed_parameter_unscaled or any other such node which can send a modulation signal to target results in a correct raw value being sent to the gain knob instead.

So peak -> gain scales the gain knob based on its min, max, scale properties. Peak -> others is correct (i haven't tested all).

@DanH Thought it was just me. Friendly bump on this one ^

@Christoph-Hart attempting to load the table envelope from that repo crashes HISE btw

@Lindon well try the global cable route. That'd what I would do. I'd expect it to be accurate enough...

@DabDab Thank you.

@Lindon try it like this i mean

HiseSnippet 1759.3oc2Y0raaaDDdojVaKk31DzbpnEfHnGb.BDrjRSKPPQjk7OQnw1BVtFonGBVStxZgn1kkbksUKBPNlWgbKuF8bO0a8QnnOA8MncVtjhjRx5OX6VTGfXt+Ly9sCmY9lgtomvh56K7PF4OdfKEYbWbqAbYm5cHLNpw1HiOBezVa23Pyi2o0wlkP0F3R78o1HCir6o1iQ9bnfe9qmWi3P3Vz3oPnSDLK5KY8Xx3YaV8aYNN6RroGy5kX2OoZCKAutvQzGvSV7lHWhUWxYzCHpskAiLVYGalT30RRjTejQtZB6As5Htfq2+ILe1oNT0fRnVfhzSuqvwVgX0yn5cXN1Mit29HjAtYrUHq1J7.79La1v4isF2KXAyXIRZOLxjFdYSAuRIg2lIf2DfjQBHkSCo6iaY4wbkwqnvycvM3RpWaBX1SBE8dQYJmEWW.6fKK1izktqGLXnDa7zM27wlv+8nmUn.X58klmS7LaR3TmRleiYjjmQk0E8bEbXvFOTu7CAYFQjxSWjxSPjJSWjJJQJTfwcXbpY69bKISvME7Z8kRAujRTOgyFVQx8XP0N8oOpvOWHuFmE8A6ez9zK9rBuAz5jO1PE+vGUzWMefX0INNmBdhaL54NUvUd1fq7RAtxSGbkmGvUY1fqxRAtJSGbUhAWBLcfPROjuQvYW3MELGco1sm3Zg5xg5MwkUIW7llfav626TpWxatZiPDW5vX7UGFmLKik1rjXiBdCNSdnKMb73A5nPaIDxmMDUvSxf.9OJLfWa4PLHtNONzADE.Y.ZFAYNW.QKu7hVIRz3L9nuqw1DIQkwJ7l.2NWpmjoLbFaSOGR+qyekGuM0uqT3BYwG51.OOGW1KiOxuu5fgCda6pdDalXOOQe2jnxl1lz2QdxXnMw4hmCKU74VULOm6ho+JIuWCVR8udDqfJjMP8qg0I9Rn829CI09OV87HGXirKhJSYPbmKUlaFpLoM3CCRqRz3bf.6qvtuCQllRVUGR3BP.dJdPEWG2mIGjzNNJOct4imNtLhIFJOmv893lLoUmIi2LS.uPv0MMdCq5Yc7NsaSsjwfMGd2WM0RbxMe4FmQEXSnbmBgtLv4q.xcCGZt6qJMoBcLdGNNCuqG0k3QOVzzgLXCeROWG5Q.der4oNBqtsX+DcbZAWMDpo1wFVcHbv8zeYXOVYtKBrzTKBDcjnujwOaehziAgI3C52qETZrEsdH5TIwynxgqGuYTR8VTtcvf+F9IbwRpwFgKVJZwX9GzAT4EButAuNBeFYrpx1uNdae2voJi1xwQUVPOWVn6K7RHXtlBmAtcDblkZJ8Nhf5V8D8CRwDf2WP7OlvbT96s56Czi1GxaAaNn2AirmP87CT7p3MKB+C7+OPXqnr1kXAV1AMIxNp.IEiK3oR8JZMziMMXS5onzQTyEZ6DfwdAooTsVjMAyk1iTMBhCyn8+Z3ehZUKhCJjXAtKJcpsXZ.p25YNhSINutmvFMFh8nESr7BfubIwGJN8wwDOnPLcsDJG8KiHj2l46B9+05Cwz5nrTyntXba5kQtB6.dy1PPZf3QtGMIdPuWxP4GNBbx2mwGgeE.E4xQlaypsjTWU.Wx7us5RuPaXRNqx1sJViowTcJjfpIDc6QBbVWpJPRl6aM8heJdufWKwYribtBbq97vkMGtt4vMLslh+84soX24toXirWSIXBbotQZ78VkP8SF6Ui+0ZI.KIO1JZH+YgDWp2pmP7XDtbHNCfuYDylZGlgaI9tTZ12kZLWgCwKIa3eNWrg5m8aR8BX8lAm3oAoMtxlzt16eaV7r3qKd14gC7tInU9uNEXJrdaw.lIACXALvsowSJ39fDvc3N92fhdULoisuWZzcOLkeN0AzYQ8pK.xvSEYerpzsDDXmD0Adlfp0tP0OvPZbvgHwDg7ZbZPTge5ggV8F.BwXhscLIoZpUw5yAMU8csV0.XJRWxP9Etjg28qiVxvGd+6+kwKYn5A6+aAkLrFdKojX0czZF9hpnEudEn1jwpWALfWY8JqGd3ujBdNnw+fC27W+Uvu.3jF8neR0agidUndJKx.zXp4VvvmGCoMUoRlVoh2X2773inNThO85vtuzNc066c9XH3Od90DBlVY52At+PSomcFbFWC1+E97WAuGP5OgidRsEkpygDj.5Tlon..hK32EUyu.I+yjpyrqrkoUuY7FhRyOlp2puT.WG82U5lq+ok9ack8+QeqqE.J2FeUmaiynGwxS7ZKcQ5Je80BlAt27f+bs4w6qFaVZz+pAHTOnSxWaYkVUiIX4kUvJKqfOYYE7KWVAe5xJ3WsrB90yVPUi9gIOTgrPRpl6nquyXGNA73ChNP+CsVewsC

@CyberGen Worked flawlessly!! Thanks!

@Christoph-Hart Is it possible for you to increase the amount on your end for future builds, or is there a significant performance impact for doing so?

@Lindon Screenshot 2024-04-02 at 10.24.20 AM.png

@bendurso Drop your network into the child node, click on 2x and set the number of clones, select signal flow (parallel or serial or copy).

RAM usage goes WAY UP if you need a lot of iterations.

@Lindon yeah you’re right! The eq module should just be enough since I was planning on using multiple filters to change slope of eq, but we’re not doing that anymore so we can just use the eq module, nice!

@d-healey said in Scriptnode Filters sound different in Ableton/Rhapsody:

Same sample rate in both?

yeh, i've resorted to using a regular lowpass w/ velocity modulator for the time being

Also 14 voices playing in HISE, only 4 in Rhapsody.

actually I think that might be a bug, my voice count in Ableton jumps around randomly, and sometimes goes to like -237, I thought it was the Wavetable synth wigging out but I've since switched to samplers and it still happens

@HISEnberg yes in my case I had to remove the MIDI part, I had an ahdsr and 2 MIDI converters, one for the gate and one for midinumber
After that it compiled successfully.

@resonant bump

@CyberGen i am, might do a new HISE build and see (hope my old projects dont crash like the last times in the new dev branch) thank you :)

@Lindon I just built the latest development version, and it's working ok. Something was wrong with my build from 2 or 3 months ago. Thank you :)

@ulrik Compiling networks with cloned nodes is a tricky business.

How complex is your network? Maybe try stripping it back and seeing if you can identify a specific thing that's causing the error. In my experience, the min/max node will not compile in a clone.

So this compiles:

Screenshot 2024-03-01 at 14.41.47.png

Whereas this gives the same 'reference to non-static member function must be called' error message as you posted.

Screenshot 2024-03-01 at 14.39.32.png