@Lindon
Yup, confirmed..

I will update the forum software in the next days trying to fix this.
As always there might be some hiccups and newly introduced glitches, so please bear with me :)

Best,
D

@Chazrox
Glad you like it. To be honest, there's not that much to do, since @Christoph-Hart has already done all the hard work for us.

Creating the WaveTable:
All you have to do is fill a buffer, which you then load into the WaveTable synth using the WaveTable controller.

Christoph has provided us with some examples in the documentation:
https://docs.hise.audio/scripting/scripting-api/wavetablecontroller/index.html

Appearance:
To make the whole thing look interesting, I drew a panel based on the slider values of a slider pack. The slider pack is transparent and the panel is behind the slider pack.

So you use the values of the individual sliders in the paintRoutine of the panel.

@Lindon make a normalised parameter in a network, apply a converter, send it to a global cable, grab the cable in UI script, in the cable callback, set the attribute... easy, straight, no math... oh wait, cables are normalised! So ask @Christoph-Hart to make non-normalised cables... ahahah...

0b2a1652422e5076d5c76780f91339b9.jpg

@Christoph-Hart Clever! 😎 can't wait for it!

@Christoph-Hart said in Mac FX failing pluginval.....:

@Lindon said in Mac FX failing pluginval.....:

DLL?, If so then if its broken(corrupt) for one HCFX shouldn't it be broken for all of them?

Yes, but the error you describe is not a deterministic programming logic error but a case of undefined behaviour - something in there is not clearing the buffers correctly and this may or may not result in trash values being in there which is what pluginval complained about.

Okay, well its all a bit academic and I dont want to monopolise your time, but that sorta doesnt jive with my understanding(which may well be where the fault lies)... these HCFX are simple filters, and there is no signal being sent thru them by pluginval, and they work fine in 3 cases (slots 1,2, & 4) but not a 4th(slot 3), where all cases are exactly the same "piece of code". One of them is generating "something unpleasant"(tm) which I might thing was the cumulative effect of the previous signal modifications, but then the 4th slot should accept this unpleasant output and reproduce it again, and it doesnt....

So bypass slot 3, but include slots 1,2, & 4 = passes
Bypass Slot 4, and include 1,2 & 3 = fail
bypass everything except 3 = fail
Bypass any combo that includes slot 3 = pass

well never mind this bit is working, more pressing issues(like the macro modulators not working at all...)

@d-healey yeah sorry my slow half typing skills...

@Lindon welp.

@Lindon thank you! :-)

@Lindon d6c4b1cd-95ad-45fe-b286-5bc0209153e3-image.png

This creates a per-voice random value between 0.0 and 1.0.

@Christoph-Hart thanks _ I'll give it a go...

oooh is there a way that some kind of analysis of each sample in the map could be done so the sampler is aware of the phase?

yes, theoretically that would somehow be possible (and I started doing this when working on the integrated legato transition engine which picks up the zero crossings to line up the phase between sustain and transition sample), but if the samples are not pitch & phase locked perfectly this falls apart plus there is a significant complexity of making this work with the streaming engine for a very narrow set of use case - if you squash your samples to be perfectly phaselocked, then it's just a minor step to transform them into wavetables and use the "proper" sound generator concept for the job at hand.

@Lindon Let me know if it works, since we're not calling ignoreEvent I think you should be good.

@Christoph-Hart said in Scriptnode Synths - recap....:

@Lindon the one from a few days ago, fresh out the oven.

..I work hard to avoid those....

@Christoph-Hart said in Filter envelope - depth - modulation:

@Lindon just modulate the attack level of the envelope?

yeah I thought of that too... the problem then is what Im doing is reducing the output of the modulator at one stage of its transit...so I did it to the sustain level too...but then Im not sure if this is exactly the same as reducing the envelope depth....its beginning to boggle my mind a bit...

@d-healey said in Global Envelopes - The "filtered" voices problem.:

@Lindon said in Global Envelopes - The "filtered" voices problem.:

direct its output to a named destination

You want to route the output of the envelope to somewhere else? Doesn't it just flow up the chain to the master?

not a Global modulation Envelope no...

@Lindon crrrrazy. 🔥

@d-healey ok thanks I will go watch the video.