@Simon loadAudioFilesIntoPool returns a list of references. Do not use findFiles, the files do not exist on the user system.

@Simon read this thread, you need to call loadAudioFilesIntoPool().

@Dan-Korneff more like January 17th..

@aaronventure actually I‘ve already implemented NAM on a local branch of HISE but it‘s not stable yet and quite CPU intensive. I hope we get the CPU down to competitive speeds with other implementations but that has indeed to wait until January.

You can also use a peak node as a member within your C++ class and pass on the external data to it, then forward all callbacks to it at the appropriate time.

@griffinboy try how far you get with the most simple approach and scale up the complexity only if you run into a dead end. Rendering a monochromatic histogram path with 30fps with Panels is not too much to ask, but make sure you use the C++ methods that create a path from a display buffer to avoid iterating over the data in HiseScript.

https://docs.hise.dev/scripting/scripting-api/displaybuffer/index.html#createpath

@deniskorg no

@d-healey might work, but with super sub-par performance (about 10x slower than HLAC / WAV).

@d-healey good spot, fixed.

What does the Debug build say? Looks like a easy fix and it's "Teach a man how to fish"-month over here...

@clevername27 Click once on the power button to start and then again to stop the profiling.

how would it not be called from the scripting thread?

Synth.deferCallbacks(false) will make the onNoteOn callback run in the audio thread. The other scenario is custom LAF which will be executed synchronously in the UI thread but if you call changed() from within a LAF function then you deserve all the pain it brings to you :)

@clevername27 changed() is guaranteed to run on the scripting thread. So if you call if from within the scripting thread, it will be synchronous, otherwise it will be asynchronous.

You can confirm this by using Perfetto and this snippet

HiseSnippet 1061.3ocsV80aaTDDeOmbErApnn9AXUdgKRVowk1BRHTBwItxJjTKbRD7T0lamK2pb2tm1cuj3Vwa74guB7UA3IdjuAvr6cN24lnjVKgevxy++MyryLdhVECFiRSB5dzrBfD7ogSmIsoCSYBIY7tjfGFd.yXAMsh0NyJXFCvIAAq7RGiftqR7e9ms1gkwjwPCKB4DkHF9AQtv1vcx16KxxFw3vQh7VZ+rsGGqjCUYpRDOqDtIofEeN6L3PlSsNgjfGrGWXU5oVlELnN6n3yllptTVo+IBi3zLvQLfLEcTEaxvTQFex7b0PHAqNoIyWoJyeb3ABt3Z9MUfO2Kf1XQ6ZPPm6BRC9.fTPKHsZEjdT3zXsnv1HwgmOIbrDaHILrT2FJU5R5zYkvgJTCocib14vHMRbsEQuXyM6SwuV+a606IOgNRoiApMEnGLd2wzXVV1oXU2PsJZJqn.jTkzKmUxEJ7WZfwoJsmmwGRg7rZ987Od1fCIfd3bWEY0kfKbX20XoWvzz8kpSGP+N5bbdFXGpxKTRjHZMuz0bVzSHyDRflTJisBkCKdgN6zprn34F0GcaFFkdusWWLqbNSjAzKE1T5DLyAqU0mx3bJ6ZZ5EB3RP22kIRpwxzV2O8NnPqRDXnOqOMUXwvBToxB8Q0TEMRoLImJjlBH1aK0huncH16jHCvzwozDrZs1niOb+edvZdKpHd5ZthrAPXlBZfJreogxhskXgaluS.7060cCq102laCVV9ErxbmUtMLNt9Rz7tPzhUNzKspoGho1qjQ9p2Bgy2E55Mz4ySb03nCXXKVi4gJOZ8F4woL4Y.OxAvdz206IIUt+cjUCmLPeqhcKHz2kgQxx7Sc8vl1uSQbBZwwxG79MVFWUUaonRNVJruBmCpnGox3twM2uu4PLots3FmqQHpp0OL+v5g4oYBNnIBzIeTnuzQ7fudQ3ebwe82aQNd7tLKataPOhQo.zVgKYB1Et.WqVsina3tf4b7UoW25WB3d76MnW0r4ku8rqInv1F6LWo4AdEI4BNOClnLBWou099eGOKTLU7FOxe6i+sW9mu4W2Ju8IABImcU6KDlxjDwU9c43.TtwhXabNthmD7EgGa.Jt4fUlYolyQ+fCRmC7iTd8I2b8HtXVwKyX1E2V6NKUKvA31qHcqAkXhLqMn9.Vgu4ctB+8EhOJbhvFmd6XrysfQ7cv+GXr9v2mEtWRBt.qAfqFN5mV1qb2S3+QUo6dAtCQ6dHDdXY9T7deLfQWJgLz4gAcbSRUza5ncUfofj6I9W7SsvAN5fZgClKDezEqUuNtZ9ycZ8i8bPLI8+Sht3eoAooKN3U8dEuz+533Ec0ML7oKqge0xZ3yVVCe9xZ3KVVC+5k0vu49Mz8Gw99RqJuZrgPNXxd9EkAA6IY3KP+qUx+AH1jXfH

Do you think there's a performance difference doing it this way and having a branch in on controller?

Not relying on the script and doing stuff in C++ is always faster.

Yes so basically you would need another call MidiAutomationHandler.setUseMidiChannels() and then it will also take into account the channel of the incoming MIDI message when learning is active (or if you pass in a custom JSON object you can just supply the channel you want).

If the MIDI automation system gives you everything except for using the MIDI channel as filter then I‘d recommend to keep on nagging me to add this - it should be a pretty easy addition with another simple check.

Dave is right you can only trace generic JSON objects not the one that wrap around C++ things.

@ccbl yes but none of that should cause an 8x performance boost (more like 20% or so). I just need to profile it and find out where it's spending its time.

@Lindon https://docs.hise.dev/scriptnode/list/container/branch.html

That‘s made precisely for this use case.

I would estimate something around 200.000€ - 300.000€ if you have to hire everybody.

@Morphoice might be true but you can‘t rely on every host to implement this, also there are other plugin formats which you need to factor in.