@Lindon said in Plugin doesn't respect UI Zoom Factor onInit:

@ccbl said in Plugin doesn't respect UI Zoom Factor onInit:

@oskarsh how would that look in context?

inline function onFiftyControl(component, value) { Settings.setZoomLevel(0.5); }; Content.getComponent("Fifty").setControlCallback(onFiftyControl)

Do you define the value as 1.0?

I really don't know coding very well.

so like this:

inline function onFiftyControl(component, value) { if(value) Settings.setZoomLevel(0.5); }; Content.getComponent("Fifty").setControlCallback(onFiftyControl)

After flushing my %appdata% config this worked! Thanks!

@aaronventure said in global send / receive:

@d-healey I vaguely remember reading somewhere about it. It should be the same whether the network gets converted to C++ on project export or on its own first, no? The only difference is some nodes, like SNEX and Faust, require in-HISE compilation first, and if you have a really hungry network, then you can get the CPU usage down by compiling it.

Though it's probably not a bad idea to get @Christoph-Hart to confirm.

@Christoph-Hart What say ye?

@ccbl your welcome.

@d-healey said in Status Indicator Best Practice:

Either use LAF to make a custom button with as many states as you want - storing the "state" in a variable.

Or use a panel and do the same thing.

or a knob with three states

I believe the issue I'm seeing is that whenever a NN node is instantiated and loaded with a model the first time, there is a loud "pop" coming from the NN node. If you are trying to switch between multiple NN nodes, whether you are using a Branch node or a soft_bypass, the NN nodes are not instantiated UNTIL signal is passing through them. So, no matter what you use to switch between NN nodes, the first time they are selected, they pop. After that (at least with a Branch node), they no long "pop".

I could work around this, IF all the NN nodes instantiated at the same time (maybe on load). I could just mute the output of the node for a moment. But, it doesn't seem to work that way.

@ccbl

That's correct

@clevername27 I appreciate your sentiment, but I'm just a guy with a normal day job with an interest in plugins. Not looking to make any money here, just releasing my work for free as and when inspiration strikes.

@ccbl Cool that worked thanks!

@Christoph-Hart Awesome thanks! This is such an unbelievable tool. Can't wait to learn more about it all.