HISE Logo Forum
    • Categories
    • Register
    • Login

    Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) in HISE

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Questions
    26 Posts 14 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Sclass
      last edited by

      Any updates?

      Christoph HartC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Christoph HartC
        Christoph Hart @Sclass
        last edited by

        @Sclass nope, working on other stuff.

        S L 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • S
          Sclass @Christoph Hart
          last edited by

          @Christoph-Hart Still keeping an eye out for the NAM update :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            Lurch @Christoph Hart
            last edited by

            @Christoph-Hart Any news? This would be an amazing addition to HISE.

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A
              aaronventure @Lurch
              last edited by aaronventure

              @Lurch I mean, it works? The performance is seemingly twice as bad as the NAM plugin, but only because the neural node in HISE is processing two channels, and the NAM plugin is processing one.

              If you use the multi node to force mono processing and before that collapse the stereo signal into mono, you get roughly the same performance.

              Create your NAM file in the colab https://colab.research.google.com/github/sdatkinson/NAMTrainerColab/blob/main/notebook.ipynb

              Put in into the Samples directory.

              const neuralNetwork = Engine.createNeuralNetwork("MidDrive");
              
              const namModel = FileSystem.getFolder(FileSystem.Samples).getChildFile("model.nam").loadAsObject();
              
              neuralNetwork.loadNAMModel(namModel);
              

              Create a ScriptFX DSPNetwork and load the math.neural node.

              It would be cool to be able to embed the .nam files into the plugin instead of having to install them separately.

              Christoph HartC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Christoph HartC
                Christoph Hart @aaronventure
                last edited by

                @aaronventure said in Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) in HISE:

                If you use the multi node to force mono processing and before that collapse the stereo signal into mono, you get roughly the same performance.

                Haha wasn't all that drama about it being 8x slower than the NAM plugin?

                It would be cool to be able to embed the .nam files into the plugin instead of having to install them separately.

                Can't you just embed the JSON content of the NAM file into a script and it will be embedded in the plugin?

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  aaronventure @Christoph Hart
                  last edited by

                  @Christoph-Hart said in Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) in HISE:

                  Haha wasn't all that drama about it being 8x slower than the NAM plugin?

                  I have no idea, I'm only now touching it for the first time.

                  I ran direct comparisons in Reaper and a Waveform Synth with NAM on stereo channels consumes 1% of CPU (20% of RT CPU), while two NAM plugins in total consume 0.9% of CPU and 18% of RT CPU.

                  So HISE is about 10% less efficient, which is good enough and entirely shippable if you ask me.

                  @Christoph-Hart said in Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) in HISE:

                  Can't you just embed the JSON content of the NAM file into a script and it will be embedded in the plugin?

                  I sure can. I feel silly now. Thank you.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • O
                    Orvillain @aaronventure
                    last edited by

                    @aaronventure
                    1e4b768a-e69c-4c6b-a7d7-b457c9837ee1-image.png

                    I'm seeing about 25% here with this. Not sure I understood about the multi container thing.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      aaronventure @Orvillain
                      last edited by

                      @Orvillain you can still see the two cables going into it. You multi node should contain a neural node and an empty chain node.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • whoopsydoodleW
                        whoopsydoodle
                        last edited by

                        How well does this nam implementation handle different sample rates? I know some get tripped up if you try to run a sample rate that's different than what your model was trained on.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          scottmire
                          last edited by

                          Strange....
                          I'm getting a "function not found" error when calling loadNAMModel

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          37

                          Online

                          1.8k

                          Users

                          12.0k

                          Topics

                          104.4k

                          Posts