Samplers as round robins?

[tomekslesicki]

Nice idea! Can I put the samplers into containers without copy-paste? It changes names of the modulators and I have quite a few of them...

[tomekslesicki]

This post is deleted!

[tomekslesicki]

Ok, I've tried to make this like that:

On init:

const var muters_a = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter1"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter2"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter3"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter4"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter5"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter6")
                     ];
                     
const var muters_b = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter7"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter8"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter9"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter10"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter11"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter12")
                     ];
                     
const var muters_c = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter13"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter14"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter15"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter16"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter17"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter18")
                     ];

const var muters = [    [muters_a],
                        [muters_b],
                        [muters_c]
                   ];
                     
                     
reg rrIndex = 0;

And note on:

function onNoteOn()
{
    local index = 0;
    
	for(m in muters)
    {
        m.setAttribute(0, rrIndex != index++);
    }
    
    rrIndex++;
    
    if(rrIndex == muters.length)
    rrIndex = 0;
}
 

But I'm getting this error:

onNoteOn() - Line 7, column 26: Unknown function 'setAttribute' {Q3ljbGVTY3JpcHR8b25Ob3RlT24oKXwxMDN8N3wyNg==}

[Christoph Hart]

You're wrapping the muterX arrays into an array again, so it doesn't reach the actual modules.

Try

const var muters = [    muters_a,
                        muters_b,
                        muters_c
                   ];

[Christoph Hart]

Oh and the onNoteOn callback is also wrong. You need a nested for loop (and make sure you don't increment the index in the most inner loop, but in the outer loop so it reflects the actual RR index.

[tomekslesicki]

@Christoph-Hart I think I understood half of this sentence :D

[tomekslesicki]

If you had a bit of time to help me out so this, I'd be really grateful :-)

[Christoph Hart]

HiseSnippet 1326.3oc6a99SabCFG+tDtokrBacqZZuzCsWPTYzDHjMoJD+H.UQqAhHz1IUUUYtyIwh6ry74ieHT+eb+ov+AaO9tK4t.GPVZSEk47hn3G+X6u9w1Oe7cBZI31Deetvvrvgm2mXX9Hq1myj8p2CSYFM11vbNqlXeIQfhLs048w99DGCSy7uPYvrvLFgetb8svtXlMIwjgwq4TaxKodTYh0Va7GTW2cwNjCodo7t5FMr4r5bWd.nm7VkM5isOF2krGV4VNKCyuZGGpjKZKwRhug4LawcNucO9orH+eM0mdjKQUnhQanihLuK20QoXkUi58ntNsFLu8MLLK1JIJjOJJ7DqlTG5P6IQiuKrBTRKRGOLycaxqRZ4UNS4UNK4YlRdyDIuGa01VP6KSpQoseH1Zh5pLh7hp0HWm7VPb1WhNAKPdAvZqOZMzaea3B+RcIxQl6KLupXSkaUluzhn6zqpyW5cKNaQTFet6gX4wZHV8iYHVYrFhZvP7trGhYKJHcQBQClC4LHxU94QVupecBX1RJmg3r83Rx9rEJU7hH2b41XWDcXGDYsXgNfF5ioBnp3UlRQUcQR2q7wS4fxwRI1uXTE3sjOQtoTJnGAczBkWbnh+40hF4ROeXC9PRaS90ydFpI+DBR1i.MvVP7HLXmsZF0iHHHNHSI5T3rL5nTdPbP0PR3jsOXCxbfcP7NH4o7jdNb3e5Sim1wCdz2whbXkQeS6rvv38ZwQlkbIrtxdoh.oWRJ9ghWaAnSG0JPwBWot5blTvccIhLqVkjRbaMbAVf2QDwhv4I2.xPGgSqilNn3MmNHc1J3roDBiobjyZvnx86SFVNZ+z.KkMFNASaJYdk1Z3zIC2RLc8bPF0izD7qW0XarDqRKEaC7qOQHopYn41jSf78QIoJXsMw+XIuOjw+ZYvf7nbm.WrbzjqJhRbEPHdjrWMTilOUddZhyGcF2r.BiqberUKpztW15MWF5EhZSa8Fyul0ZmNcH1xDwNi0t+4mVX0cIk4hjx2X0lxHg4aCExOFVF8FLjY4EDFQnBpUtk6U72i68J5O12qXeaIL7GJvL+9b+Q531DO5gblJhjX7U9jcEj+5.0pbZ604XQlUc456BSxLaSarLPDtcYSOd.SNx1i7i8Zx+g62Lyz59M4GusL2wcZxOXexP1anRdTR4Q2cb0fT9wKHcaY0LyEmDDbUFpl4huK0VARIbvl5nLQ6x3BRrovj8oW7LFi93as5POqsLv9XU9Z+q1IWt9muTkeZV7JLPisod8cI6vNg3B7fPM98..nCNvUNv5nqiM4Ld+dbF0NcT7.BbiktcIhzZOyIDb2F3wCRr7jMNf3RvoON+Ka7R3XHV.wIxDFKpL9whaa85mrhjKRkZB8v.wk++mHtC3ARJqaSLrQ8LCSq8B7ZCjEaBnDFi3BCjkYNU9fnxkUkiPKLmvB+C7ItxJpxlwUVYPkSJFc46IXzKWWiQu+gQW9K.LJP.0Xz6.itrFipwnZL5zCitx8kmFcCMF89GFcEMF8AAFcEMFUiQ0XzoGFsp9k5pwn2HFsp9k59f.iVUiQ0XTMFc5gQWU+Rc0XzaDitp9oQePfQWUiQ0XTMFc5gQqoeotYgQm7i2ewiNqoQmOHPm0znSM5TiNGCz4miwvCaK3u2NJokZu7WGZAl2rv+MdJX0TUFUYPVJKqxKU1vCxJ+daaU39Wg3S1sY4InMqLAso5DzlUmf1TaBZyuMAs42u01n.haFH4dQGEACs1I7OxeSycXXXmb3tdi+EfGr3z6

Interesting part:

const var muters = [[Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter1"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter4")],
                    [Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter2"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter5")],
                    [Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter3"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter6")]]
                    
reg rrIndex = 0;    
                

function onNoteOn()
{
    local index = 0;
    
    for(pair in muters)
    {
        for(m in pair)
        {
            m.setAttribute(0, rrIndex != index);
        }
        
        // Move the incrementation here or it will be incremented 6 times instead of three
        index++;
    }
    
    rrIndex++;
    
    if(rrIndex == muters.length)
        rrIndex = 0;
}

This should be adaptable to your setup without too many hurdles...

[tomekslesicki]

Thanks! It adapted perfectly :-)

[tomekslesicki]

This post is deleted!

[tomekslesicki]

Ok, just a quick follow up - the solution that @Christoph-Hart posted works great most of the time but I’m getting occasional stuck notes. Any way to remedy that?

[Christoph Hart]

Do the stuck notes occur with MPE or with normal keyboards too? And does it happen with the sine example that I posted or is it just with samplers?

[tomekslesicki]

@Christoph-Hart said in Samplers as round robins?:

Do the stuck notes occur with MPE or with normal keyboards too? And does it happen with the sine example that I posted or is it just with samplers?

Only with the Samplers, and with normal keyboards too

[tomekslesicki]

And I have fix stuck notes enabled

[Christoph Hart]

Hmm, maybe you need to send me the project so I can debug it. Not sure why this happens, but there might be a few edge cases that cause these issues.