Samplers as round robins?

ustk

@tomekslesicki You can put them in 3 containers

tomekslesicki

Nice idea! Can I put the samplers into containers without copy-paste? It changes names of the modulators and I have quite a few of them...

tomekslesicki

This post is deleted!

tomekslesicki

Ok, I've tried to make this like that:

On init:

const var muters_a = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter1"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter2"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter3"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter4"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter5"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter6")
                     ];
                     
const var muters_b = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter7"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter8"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter9"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter10"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter11"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter12")
                     ];
                     
const var muters_c = [    Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter13"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter14"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter15"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter16"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter17"),Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter18")
                     ];

const var muters = [    [muters_a],
                        [muters_b],
                        [muters_c]
                   ];
                     
                     
reg rrIndex = 0;

And note on:

function onNoteOn()
{
    local index = 0;
    
	for(m in muters)
    {
        m.setAttribute(0, rrIndex != index++);
    }
    
    rrIndex++;
    
    if(rrIndex == muters.length)
    rrIndex = 0;
}

But I'm getting this error:

onNoteOn() - Line 7, column 26: Unknown function 'setAttribute' {Q3ljbGVTY3JpcHR8b25Ob3RlT24oKXwxMDN8N3wyNg==}

Christoph Hart

You're wrapping the muterX arrays into an array again, so it doesn't reach the actual modules.

Try

const var muters = [    muters_a,
                        muters_b,
                        muters_c
                   ];

Christoph Hart

Oh and the onNoteOn callback is also wrong. You need a nested for loop (and make sure you don't increment the index in the most inner loop, but in the outer loop so it reflects the actual RR index.

tomekslesicki

@Christoph-Hart I think I understood half of this sentence :D

tomekslesicki

If you had a bit of time to help me out so this, I'd be really grateful :-)

Christoph Hart

HiseSnippet 1326.3oc6a99SabCFG+tDtokrBacqZZuzCsWPTYzDHjMoJD+H.UQqAhHz1IUUUYtyIwh6ry74ieHT+eb+ov+AaO9tK4t.GPVZSEk47hn3G+X6u9w1Oe7cBZI31Deetvvrvgm2mXX9Hq1myj8p2CSYFM11vbNqlXeIQfhLs048w99DGCSy7uPYvrvLFgetb8svtXlMIwjgwq4TaxKodTYh0Va7GTW2cwNjCodo7t5FMr4r5bWd.nm7VkM5isOF2krGV4VNKCyuZGGpjKZKwRhug4LawcNucO9orH+eM0mdjKQUnhQanihLuK20QoXkUi58ntNsFLu8MLLK1JIJjOJJ7DqlTG5P6IQiuKrBTRKRGOLycaxqRZ4UNS4UNK4YlRdyDIuGa01VP6KSpQoseH1Zh5pLh7hp0HWm7VPb1WhNAKPdAvZqOZMzaea3B+RcIxQl6KLupXSkaUluzhn6zqpyW5cKNaQTFet6gX4wZHV8iYHVYrFhZvP7trGhYKJHcQBQClC4LHxU94QVupecBX1RJmg3r83Rx9rEJU7hH2b41XWDcXGDYsXgNfF5ioBnp3UlRQUcQR2q7wS4fxwRI1uXTE3sjOQtoTJnGAczBkWbnh+40hF4ROeXC9PRaS90ydFpI+DBR1i.MvVP7HLXmsZF0iHHHNHSI5T3rL5nTdPbP0PR3jsOXCxbfcP7NH4o7jdNb3e5Sim1wCdz2whbXkQeS6rvv38ZwQlkbIrtxdoh.oWRJ9ghWaAnSG0JPwBWot5blTvccIhLqVkjRbaMbAVf2QDwhv4I2.xPGgSqilNn3MmNHc1J3roDBiobjyZvnx86SFVNZ+z.KkMFNASaJYdk1Z3zIC2RLc8bPF0izD7qW0XarDqRKEaC7qOQHopYn41jSf78QIoJXsMw+XIuOjw+ZYvf7nbm.WrbzjqJhRbEPHdjrWMTilOUddZhyGcF2r.BiqberUKpztW15MWF5EhZSa8Fyul0ZmNcH1xDwNi0t+4mVX0cIk4hjx2X0lxHg4aCExOFVF8FLjY4EDFQnBpUtk6U72i68J5O12qXeaIL7GJvL+9b+Q531DO5gblJhjX7U9jcEj+5.0pbZ604XQlUc456BSxLaSarLPDtcYSOd.SNx1i7i8Zx+g62Lyz59M4GusL2wcZxOXexP1anRdTR4Q2cb0fT9wKHcaY0LyEmDDbUFpl4huK0VARIbvl5nLQ6x3BRrovj8oW7LFi93as5POqsLv9XU9Z+q1IWt9muTkeZV7JLPisod8cI6vNg3B7fPM98..nCNvUNv5nqiM4Ld+dbF0NcT7.BbiktcIhzZOyIDb2F3wCRr7jMNf3RvoON+Ka7R3XHV.wIxDFKpL9whaa85mrhjKRkZB8v.wk++mHtC3ARJqaSLrQ8LCSq8B7ZCjEaBnDFi3BCjkYNU9fnxkUkiPKLmvB+C7ItxJpxlwUVYPkSJFc46IXzKWWiQu+gQW9K.LJP.0Xz6.itrFipwnZL5zCitx8kmFcCMF89GFcEMF8AAFcEMFUiQ0XzoGFsp9k5pwn2HFsp9k59f.iVUiQ0XTMFc5gQWU+Rc0XzaDitp9oQePfQWUiQ0XTMFc5gQqoeotYgQm7i2ewiNqoQmOHPm0znSM5TiNGCz4miwvCaK3u2NJokZu7WGZAl2rv+MdJX0TUFUYPVJKqxKU1vCxJ+daaU39Wg3S1sY4InMqLAso5DzlUmf1TaBZyuMAs42u01n.haFH4dQGEACs1I7OxeSycXXXmb3tdi+EfGr3z6

Interesting part:

const var muters = [[Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter1"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter4")],
                    [Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter2"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter5")],
                    [Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter3"), Synth.getMidiProcessor("MidiMuter6")]]
                    
reg rrIndex = 0;    
                

function onNoteOn()
{
    local index = 0;
    
    for(pair in muters)
    {
        for(m in pair)
        {
            m.setAttribute(0, rrIndex != index);
        }
        
        // Move the incrementation here or it will be incremented 6 times instead of three
        index++;
    }
    
    rrIndex++;
    
    if(rrIndex == muters.length)
        rrIndex = 0;
}

This should be adaptable to your setup without too many hurdles...

tomekslesicki

Thanks! It adapted perfectly :-)

tomekslesicki

This post is deleted!

tomekslesicki

Ok, just a quick follow up - the solution that @Christoph-Hart posted works great most of the time but I’m getting occasional stuck notes. Any way to remedy that?

Christoph Hart

Do the stuck notes occur with MPE or with normal keyboards too? And does it happen with the sine example that I posted or is it just with samplers?

tomekslesicki

@Christoph-Hart said in Samplers as round robins?:

Do the stuck notes occur with MPE or with normal keyboards too? And does it happen with the sine example that I posted or is it just with samplers?

Only with the Samplers, and with normal keyboards too

tomekslesicki

And I have fix stuck notes enabled

Christoph Hart

Hmm, maybe you need to send me the project so I can debug it. Not sure why this happens, but there might be a few edge cases that cause these issues.

Samplers as round robins?

48

1.7k

11.7k

102.0k