@Christoph-Hart The tables really, really need an update

All value currently set above 85% are shifting up at each mouse click !

And setting the value is so rough, often jumping by 2% with no possibilities to get more precision.

This is making me think

1. What about the possibility of opening all current point in an array/table like popup so we can edit the point numerically?

2. Or expand the area for more precision?

3. would there be possible to show the values with a custom range (even if 0-1 behind the scene) so we would be able for instance to set frequencies or gains precisely?

A table for the real guys

Of course all of that can be made from the UI, but when you design a network, you might not have/need a connection. And I can't imagine making a connection, dropping the table because you make another design choice, put back a table because, well, wasn't so bad... In short network design is no time for creating a UI connection + script just for testing things...

@Christoph-Hart Amazing! So what I've said is just wrong!

@Orvillain I think you'll only be able to modulate the parameters (aka UI parameter modulation) without the whole MatrixModulation benefits. Also it might not be polyphonic

@obolig Mmmm... That seems an expected behaviour if you set InternalOnly...

the MasterClock class shows:

	enum class SyncModes
	{
		Inactive, //> No syncing going on
		ExternalOnly, //< only reacts on external clock events
		InternalOnly, //< only reacts on internal clock events
		PreferInternal, //< override the clock value with the internal clock if it plays
		PreferExternal, //< override the clock value with the external clock if it plays
		SyncInternal, //< sync the internal clock when external playback starts
		numSyncModes
	};

SyncInternal might do the job

Yep wanted to do that kind of thing a while back but it seems Juce doesn't have a method to read the pixel under the mouse (or any pos..)

@ulrik Also you could have a look at the sort and filter functions. they might help you building an editor. And what about placing all properties in column so you get a table? Might be even more readable...

@ulrik Looks nice! I tried to make not so long ago then I finally decided to just edit the XML directly. Sometimes it's faster, especially for main network parameters as they all are at the same place

@Christoph-Hart Network bookmarks are not working. All it does is showing the whole graph unfolded with minimum zoom.

Also, it would be nice to:

• Be able to recall not just the folded state but the viewport position as well. In short, the exact thing that was displayed when creating the bookmark
• Have a keyboard shortcut with numpad combination
• Have the sliders in the Parameter section of the Node List showing the values. And have the Node List to be resizable for improved slider precision. They are good allies, but they could be better.

Navigating the graphs can be cumbersome by nature even on wide comfortable monitors. I think that making the experience better is not to be taken lightly seeing the time one can spend in there

@d-healey Definitely... 've been caught by the same 2 days ago...