Using Constant for Gain/Volume.



  • I am using multiple samplers in a Synthesizer group.

    I need to control the volume of each sampler , as far as I can tell I should probably use a Gain-Constant Modulator as I cannot use a simple gain and I am assuming that using the sampler volume will not give me smooth /crackle free gain.

    My question is , can I get a log/db response for the constant , it sounds like its linear?



  • Why can't you use simple gain on each sampler?



  • There is no FX option on each sampler when used in a synthesizer group.



  • Why not put it on the synth group then? or do you need individual control?



  • @d-healey Because in each group there are 3 samplers , and I need Individual volume control.
    I guess I could just not use a group and link the Adsrs between them ?
    That is the only reason I am using a group .



  • Do you need to control the volume while sounds are playing?



  • @d-healey yes, its a drawbar system .



  • @lalalandsynth Then I think constant mod is your only option, I don't know a formula to convert from DB to intensity though.



  • @d-healey Ok, I guess I will not use a group then .

    Question on voice amount.
    When I use a group - 3 samplers per group.
    The total group gets 256 voices.

    When I use the samplers individually i,e not in a group , each sampler gets 256 voices.
    What would you recommend for the voice amount for each sampler ?
    I am assuming that is a CPU issue and I need to economize ?
    Each sampler can only play 2 octaves , but polyphonic.

    Any thoughts on this ?



  • @lalalandsynth Hard to say, but yeah the lower the better in terms of cpu



  • Use this scriptnode-powered time variant modulator in each sampler for a simple real-time gain control (adjust the smoothing time as you like and setup the parameter range to be as logarithmic as you want to):

    HiseSnippet 1318.3ocyW8zaaTDEeV6LoMNosTZ4FfV0SoRkHaZ3ORHHlD6TY03DqrIozSkI6N1dj2clUyLNItUb.ItyY3Bhu.HNBGPju.bhOAbfCbqW3b4Myt1d8eZiwHnrWrm27dy96898du4sMjBepRIjHmkNnWLE4rB1qGW2dq1DFGUqBx4p35DklJcSDsYuXhRQCPNN4umQfyRKfrOOciMIgDtOcnHD5HAymtCKhoGJsQ46yBC2lDPOfEkQ60KWyWv2RDJ5B3IOtHJl32gzhtKwnVNLxYwpALsP5oIZpBzYSQPOu1hS4I5eDSwNNjZVTB4AGThXzVsYgAM56qJDxYgFC877Id9Mw0YArAxGFAdE6FtCsHaLvI2nPZgQfTorPpXFHssHLvb.FUlDdnLnagDzAfPDzMjnGEYFJHcClXT1oFWS4JltWVJ5uAbKMU3N0noSF7hSv6qi87krXsghOhHYDtdfCXwtapBtFMbSUwcfNktXeIwdTta3fg7Fk18DhzMPE69gtU4sXb5Z9RJ3lUTw6R0mJjcV8Vv1251tevUJzrK22DxbikzXhjdfnQHo2pJRTbHcevp63l7eUCpbyPgemaW3IEVpvmUvMioVu1t6pG2sYSpbRkD7cEZ5d7Ueta0r4T2aKAWKEggT4KZ6U4ciNlJuC37gcoCTD3gQI5kmMhVvqwY58hoopMRzouXnvLimOTZeWcBIMalUzPGaJRGJB3Tfz0Yv7TJT1JQISNX5A.ppsYfWMMAyKjEPkHFjHcI784hiKgrwprsoPoIH1j4z+C+yjmhwPNiQpHvXx1DeHp1qAQ2F4bcShmFJAox07GTUtnwhRnc6FAUpbNMDB+XmbvaYGHbMhXm7liseKOrCx5RQQFWxzvK8+OfEXdcXm6.ZjTWrOjbZpbpqx1.0DrZPjP+Rnis47y4jGhWwTolQMwKyqy3j4RbmKm3gjf.zHNVAbD76ZF4uLbiw.8vFbGPjsnZaGxgdoo+S+UvoTieBXYRei5L9Qiy00ImMlrmtwNhSoxwtlBgNLNdBoPaGMM1i8Xq8O4le289sG+Ea30gdZR.Lqllf6kvIurIdknLLvh3VljmQnfkgbKIcM6Fu74.mboqfNv4MPdE79TEUOUmCXmtGGx7MfBMlcWCenhNildg7dtYm2e34Sx6ln3j79COeZ7NBkk2+5ux77iiw6ej+O8Ks99WqbBkZmNZvar329mq+Ge9abN5eTpZ4ur7LmpB5dwP9Y89lF2nxuZSUWF6EID51Ldqg3d86ZdtV4meA2hYb2Ysda1qgxZ5m9Cu4uugsQOmZuFTk12OcIjUZpApELnhZ.LSjYwHnuMpKMs4pE.0Dl4J1KNYtkBXu9ol++Igp5Yv8vJk0EgRYzg0pPzj9W5AdPlRUGmJzSfgtSbmkvUnpNZQrU2nXA21OXkK7JxyxhzdYWnz8LyMrnUQTDKHHj1P.CmYg2.l6mUSgiix9ACHTD4rrbsBFghcl0EaxBiTZ.a0hfO..47pl1FtAzljtgZWUG3bBY7NzfCDIgjYbh4qiavz9sm9Hy4lxXlltL+KOge52ebEbUXBRe8Pvt.d6O4+fO1XeQWMTyWm.waH5igqU7fKQ7oiemS55h8udwixCrKdF7jtYIyZmzMK0eSfo8khG4mLhlor8xVI.l31OtaI3qLg0tClMCiKtVQS1E6Q99lPwaUBgltMu8bXycmCaVeNr4clCad24vl2aNr48eg1X9l2OtqVDkTl.BZT010wwoJm.YY1LRzeAakrS4A
    

    As for the performance question: the synth group is a bit more efficient because it handles the voices together, but you won't get too much CPU optimisations there as the bottleneck will most likely be something else.



  • @Christoph-Hart Awesome ! Thanks !


Log in to reply
 

13
Online

752
Users

3.0k
Topics

24.9k
Posts