The most cost effective way to export for MacOS

[d.healey]

I use a Mac Mini circa 2013

[Dan Korneff]

@d-healey That's what I originally had. This hack mini is on par with my old 2013 mini
I'm just gonna build another i9 hack and call it a day. It's been stable and reliable for the past 2 year so no need to fix what ain't broken.

[Dan Korneff]

I decided to take it for a test drive anyway...
Compiling a test project -
hack mini - 25:30
i9 PC - 3:22

I guess it COULD be worse.
If anyone else wants to go down this road, I can confirm it's working.

• Catalina
• Latest HISE scriptnode
• JUCE 6
• xCode 10.3
• IPP 2021

[Christoph Hart]

Yes the i9 is really something. I‘m also using one as my main development rig - I went from a 2012 mac mini to this machine a few years ago and the performance difference changed my life...

[d.healey]

@dustbro said in

• JUCE 6

JUCE 6 or Projucer 6?

[Dan Korneff]

@d-healey said in The most cost effective way to export for MacOS:

Projucer 6

yes to both... maybe?
I never could get Projucer 5 to open on Catalina, and pointing Projucer to the HISE JUCE folder gave me errors.
so I guess, technically, I compiled HISE and a project with Projucer 6 and JUCE6 libraries.

[d.healey]

@dustbro Oooo :) Can you tell me what was necessary to use JUCE 6?

[Dan Korneff]

@d-healey I take that back. Only Projucer 6 to compile HISE. The HISE project settings were directed to the scriptnode folder, so I'm thinking now it used the included JUCE libraries to export the plugin.

[d.healey]

[Christoph Hart]

Just Fyi I‘m planning to migrate to JUCE 6 for HISE 3.0...

[d.healey]

@Christoph-Hart Excellent!

[orange]

@Christoph-Hart said in The most cost effective way to export for MacOS:

Just Fyi I‘m planning to migrate to JUCE 6 for HISE 3.0...

So HISE 3.0 exported plugins will be M1 chipset compatible natively, right? (I assume if M1 system used for compiling of course)

[Christoph Hart]

Yes, that's the plan.

[orange]

@Christoph-Hart said in The most cost effective way to export for MacOS:

Yes, that's the plan.

Awesome!

[d.healey]

@Christoph-Hart said in The most cost effective way to export for MacOS:

Yes the i9 is really something.

Any specific recommendations?

[Christoph Hart]

Yes, build a passively cooled system. I only have one case fan that goes on for a few seconds when compiling with all cores at 100%, but apart from that, it's dead silence here...

[d.healey]

@Christoph-Hart What processor and cooler/heatsink do you use?

[Christoph Hart]

i9/9900K + a custom passive system from these guys:

silentmaxx | leise PC - silent PC und Notebook

silentmaxx® ist seit 18 Jahren Marktführer der leisen und lautlosen PC mit einem Gesamtumsatz von mehr als 100 Mio € - made in Germany •. Spezialist für ...

https://www.silentmaxx.de/ (www.silentmaxx.de)

(it's german, but you should get some information out of it).

[d.healey]

@Christoph-Hart Thanks. I was looking at the i9/10900 because it's TDP is 65W I was thinking it would be good for a passive system (my current system is also passive but lacks horsepower). But if the 95W CPU can also be passively cooled successfully then maybe I'll go up a level :)

[Lindon]

@d-healey said in The most cost effective way to export for MacOS:

i9/10900

is there some reason your not considering any of the AM Ryzen options? =- Just curious...