LAF SliderPack Bug

[DanH]

@Christoph-Hart Thanks, I'm still struggling to understand how to implement this into that code.... :face_with_tears_of_joy:

	// linear interpolate each slider
	// unfortunately you have to hardcode the slider amount
	// (if it's dynamic, use obj.parentName to fetch the parent slider pack)
	var c = Colours.mix(l, r, parseInt(obj.Arpeggiator1) / 16); // this is normally parseInt(obj.id)

	g.setColour(c);

[d.healey]

@DanH Console.print(trace(obj)); Will show you all of the data that is available to you in the obj object.

[DanH]

@d-healey what am I looking for? I was hoping something like this might work

	// linear interpolate each slider
	// unfortunately you have to hardcode the slider amount
	// (if it's dynamic, use obj.parentName to fetch the parent slider pack)
	var c = Colours.mix(l, r, parseInt(obj.parentName) / numSliders); 

	g.setColour(c);

[d.healey]

@DanH obj.parentName is a string (the I'd of the parent control) why are you trying to convert that to a number? Use Console.print everywhere to figure out what the code you're writing is doing.

[DanH]

@d-healey I'm not.... Maybe this doesn't make sense without context...

const var SliderPacks =
{
  "SliderPack4": Content.getComponent("SliderPack4"),
  "SliderPack5": Content.getComponent("SliderPack5")
};

function drawRotarySlider(g, obj)
{
    var numSliders = SliderPacks[obj.parentName].getNumSliders();
}

SPLAF.registerFunction("drawLinearSlider", function(g, obj)
{
	// ID is the number of the slider
	var a = obj.area;
	var v = obj.valueNormalized;
	var l = 0x7FE903D9;
	var r = 0xA502A3A3;
		
	g.setColour(0x7302A3A3);
	g.drawHorizontalLine(a[3] / 2, a[0], a[2]);
	
	// linear interpolate each slider
	// unfortunately you have to hardcode the slider amount
	// (if it's dynamic, use obj.parentName to fetch the parent slider pack)
	var c = Colours.mix(l, r, parseInt(obj.id) / 16);

	g.setColour(c);
	
	if (v >= 1)
	{
		a[1] = a[1] + a[3] / 2 * (1.0 - v);
		a[3] = a[3] / 2 - a[1];
	}		
	else
	{
		a[1] = a[3] / 2;
		a[3] = a[3] / 2 - a[3] / 2 * (2.0 * v);
	}

	g.fillRect(a);

});

[d.healey]

@DanH are you trying to get the index in an array?

[DanH]

@d-healey ok let's rewind a bit, this is the line I don't understand:

// (if it's dynamic, use obj.parentName to fetch the parent slider pack)

Am I supposed to replace obj.id with obj.parentName? And don't I also need to replace the number of sliders with something dynamic?

[Christoph Hart]

@DanH The 16 is hardcoded in this example.

var c = Colours.mix(l, r, parseInt(obj.id) / SliderPacks[obj.parentName].getNumSliders());

@d-healey If you're using drawLinearSlider to paint SliderPacks, the id property will just contain the slider index so it's valid to parseInt() that bad boy...

[DanH]

@Christoph-Hart Thanks! - still a bit janky, however!

HiseSnippet 1760.3ocwX01SabDD9LvQqcJMPZj5WWwGZMINN1.kl1HZrM1j3FCXESnQBghVtaO6s9tccuaOCNUHk9GJ+EZ+Ik+Aoyrme4LuEGWhp+vYMyryrOyb67xd08kVrf.ouQhj62qCyHwWY1nmP0ZqVTtvnZYiDoLaTmrekF6SLJ0qCMHfYajHwrOEkmH4bF5eu+IkntTgEaDKCiCjbKVMtGWMha8BOm65tM0lsO2K1pWuPUKoXKoqLDvxrl4L5PsZSax1khKaFSiDyWwlqj9MTTEKvHwbkj18ZzRdhHZ8GvC3G6xPh7FM.CEwdaoqMhXjqwVs3t10G3yAFfUpOJBLaTD3tl6vs4C4OJRrnV.YjFwiGIlYb3M6XvKeb3kKF7tDHMSLHMWDjVxrgkOuiZjDDO2xrpPw7cnPXONThVqwLqYZtkDVgPk0i1lssOPLTizajKWFB7XkGmJED5CTjtTehK0grIohnIWvxZ4y.m4otxiotQFslT1tnvdaFyM83J1vkay7qCuzxCFXv91jo1R50QJ.hzKGaMKeNsqWq31wzKZmqIsntSxVFP1L0elhPFaG94IAEYRk5Lvn58OqOqIO.hOaGJrTboH8x19zSpAgBpejVKmg3LPXyLD4w+9JvFm7gOjTsLgGPTsXDQn2wLehzQSEn0KURDvTvCAUxRAu6wQr51mUWpaHaWouG0k+Flceot5PBlSDjsCWztOa+XrOFzCXmLUxlYCP+DYmdfzSZwULHpABQW4YRe9affBDUAmJM8v0Nh7PxpYHzCycD9b0ivEqcHWsaS33AlNRW30AgQsZMzgfkDJbj9pPAHysGomLjzh1kQTR3eeaKoMKVHfP8jgBkVwzbGBW88AD6dBpG2JCILfoiCcfXiPgI8nYbXJXGQaDwefovZCqDgSLdXEKd3wOMsaFheFTk.FbdOMZWt8JfmleiH26SRoXGyNbbHdDdxZ2PunUDjdkUdLA7tcq7ajZU2sBrSi+VwRu6oRBde5tjeYSRdvIfiOIoGl+H.N5+tOYvqEx8HoymMG4AjtnhI072bj3GnU.jbF95m4FvNm0hV2Uo5nMYUXStWzlbVJLn1LqCTk9ELKUZZzoGMM79Cpkhrohltv4mLj0QwD3WpyvjyX4VneegDXcdFrvAIQDoXWohsmHsNOJ0YoHmWjiykJCys8kttL+KUL1cw+5TLcTZZFhNya3BgRtiWG27pqiGuMiUTolXKTJpJ3p85vDWUyGi90mvZ98QEr8JcE+6zuh+n.pAGJtufYrHrgF5.DSbavX1TE0HwglardV3W4hagOqAO1sK7PjEoKgzkQ5rZ5e54Y6+y495+JiOpizYKBOJgz0P55EKFgWMHmMBje8XfTCvuv74B4wCg1f164JX7xpkQDBMn561PnnCyWwwnbhxrtvvBQc6RZVlEzVI6niK8qaCs69DhLmNZqqVn2Ph2RKbB2V0ZHiBusPKFuYqXSnzqfW7Iadz+nXmpFLXRx4e26d2GP9PehNMfR0wmAxiFaeeTgNCdWW0FiUE86vZ1jSgCW3ogQN1W+QilWg6j6uJDn5gGFmWuPCOtssKqtLfiG1iAs+dDbMMgZJFi4iFFig7bEBBcb3mpG6BR78BT.tp5ASigg+WBkpsYNzPWndbavNPmh1L68k50ecNMT4DpZB8SPY21DqbhvJxeMt3jXKDWc8HOmyfiM.1rS7.X4u1AvhkV9MW0I9RgJEDf4ZeLBE8YctC9FWcVSLarf4KXP4xOYSD6nx4CmWLAbBLxsLQKnwxzghE0FnQa9U.i2+jIIb.VAlq34rdA+WhHfyzgwr0IFmy.e2EiFK12.Pd4wxRxS0l.p0v9iPFbulgrmbGJFTVvbOnmYW1Kf9lroyaRZ1nEjU5xltSX2xrhfBG+2mytNW3569bWHb3w2GJaESv+aMg9XX8.lqzhq5cQrNpr3X3049kJhvA1u0BqeyPOw38Nl0XhlpVSNZai61A+JrauRV+lg1XxRKVxDtTrPvbavbggAkSRZ9kZnu0buPUmP0Mj4Vxbm5Uf5+9CL3ExUlv79aiFphv9JLy0TLMVJ27lOS5ZeIoqW798KZtizNzEapE+yMfeik9Bv14w61g2iW.s46EOJci8MHlTHtjYcNbCsKGiybIXDG08y.FGNuPEGG3DzH.Nm41u5yymow.tMjhKZtCEFNBFUR29ElQDZUDcnAu6PhYvpyQz4PZLBzfIr0De.90WXdjNQeg4GHDFKyxW9ZqnyZ32F5K0b.LIzeVrjl6fzjQWEvLmd3Na9qsrP2+A4MLtbcVcJzYsoPm0mBc9goPmMlBc9woPmGcs5fegvhgJoWT5.vndE88dRjHpAr9Tnw+16qWeJ

[A Former User]

Has the bipolar fix been merged yet? Just noticed this on my arp sliderpack

[DanH]

@iamlamprey no but see the snippet for a workaround in laf

[DanH]

Need some help with this LAF. Trying to draw the rectangle with drawRect on a bipolar SliderPack (+/- 24) and it will only draw on the + side when the Slider hits the max value (24). The - side is fine, as in the uni-directional SliderPack below... Thanks!!

HiseSnippet 1307.3ocsW0rbaaCDFTwzSoRSmlN8TOgwmjSTTnjr7OSlzZY8iiScrThbRsGOdx.QBIgXR.URHYqzwuA8de.5KRO1Gm9Fjt.TRjxV10VyTdfh6t3C3aWrXwplABGZXnH.YXc3n9TjwWa1ZDW1qROBii1qJx3aLeCITRCvQp1YTeRXH0EYX7fcUJLrVBoe9meZGhGg6PiUgPePvbn6y7YxXsM29mYdd0ItzCY9IF8ZaumifWQ3IF.74Al1n9DmyHcoGPTCKkIxX4ZtLoHnkjHogvX1Q3NpUOw47nw+AVHqsGUIjG0BlnH0nJ8XdtMm3qgHjwRMi87GD44eu4aXtro5ii.eq1.NFQxXfQpaiR4uGTxHAkVJhRO1rkS.quL1hhOOzbONrgzg.g5jTIZrnT+foYEALBtLmO4LZ8.PXJhLqaamECuV8EoSCg6PIdHI.2xi4RCZBw60vuDOAdWprhvuufCBYVIwXVAPOOvktCfKo.mdlEu49kqm.oS.EBl6KbHd6KDmUl6VmR8xL6ZpvT3NAJsdr4BncYpD45C3NRlfmYE2.x46y3TRPD6VIKtyDicyhEs+zpo+szVO+438phYgXYOJlOvuMbXPzQKEpwk1RwHBPF.RNBPjWDoZ3XUCIdCnGHB7IdrOScAJY0MWnJ9nx0yXewFEsKTtX4h.aAKJd8JQ.6yfqAdCvvLjSJdJ943BYwjSrOU8tvoqNcd1Mf3xffPc3bUlSrunVknoKKNOrYaqckbLI0OZAyGoOusczbv5fyLD+iuDme0zVfCaQNI+o.00+7T7j0F+Dbl74rwOCOTwSKs9WFa9YZ.fkKsrRaQ8BoWY1hF2MAMdQJ.KxShVjK0tXGvudG0Qlgnzckf2QS713fmdrS1KxlW4jWpSDhyfUyv0RVzIJSyXJrvoLyea4nMpWaK6hU25NtsLwAz6Bw4Vp.0zch4jcMNsXZLaBt4E5lvnaKzYggmqF+JcywuBq9hIgDrfefPRavynOHk9xz3qZpSm4ZScpNP34QClqY0EGA2FvLQmSyh0AmoCDprNa45kuakqchJxjXfB9dblrQe5X45BOWUYX02Wu3NZbUJnLepwLDnhTWj+6FWjON3hXvD8HyDYqHsafLLMT2U5RjDjwIlquVN0S4J4x0r59vWGODd8IkbmZUgOa1Dd0tbY38tJ41J4gwxuWIKut8H9dOIYoXR9vYI4qpI2ZqOsyuzXCF75hFpOeZ6M4C2n0qau4Pk7fs3G6cbI1gEKIZDrK.3nFut85sJV5s1M7.SOUKWY8218WandsUND586UUsHvceiCuPHuOMPxT6rFUoCgdOhtH0xrJM7LonuN9O9RI3lz6wNvEIaqYTrvwa6mrKnM+KeRhgt41P8i9sfykQoFmybk8TgniRgP8nrt8jJo+FFZbgfB.9k+Cj4WPynVo8OQKetdhS3EKeO1htIuXz12.y9ccGaWqyDnmHg6.Ohb1FkTcDN1.bbbltSTcfvCYxQI6X7dz8j8s18zckhO1rIS5za9bL0b3n5D6+CbbbOmOxrVmNPE2XBtjY8iVzFL+OV92IFHY7tugHCXPdf4AC7aAoUNTX04b39Z09cJUtUjrsRVEAZQ4tZgu.OiMlWIaL1X9IFQ9Dm.wGchpdn5p8qzZ.Nw0MwaA+aBPFmeZwBS6b1HenA6O53nb+mA0OmOlBK.lhK.l0V.LkV.Lqu.X1XAvr4shQ8eaJOPJ7iNN.JZVSWV0vnFm.YV5rPz+NhzdOO

[DanH]

@DanH encountering a similar issue with this snippet. Only works if the slider is at max value on the + side... Really strange as this has been working fine for weeks and I haven't touched it!

HiseSnippet 1112.3ocsV0uSiaDDeMfqpc6U0q5d.VweYNBFGBkODh1P9hx0.jdg6NjhPmVr2D1C6ciVuIPtS7t0Go9FzNqsC1vEN0F0KxxQyG+142N6Ly5NRgOMNVHQFVmMYHEY78lcmvUWU+JBiiNpAx3GLOlDqnRbppZSFRhioAHCiEOTqvvZITxu+5WqQBIbeZtJD5sBlOsMKhox01o5uyBCaQBnmwhJ38lUOxWvqKBEi.9rnoGZHw+Zx.5IDsaKXhL9llALkP1UQTzXjwR0DAS5dk3Fdp+ukEytLjpEJi5BKTp5Vhv.Mi0ZQ0uhEFzY59NFAqRm7rvhoYgWXdLKfcu97rwOlX.minX9vXgGRuEe.8JWjddEn2LnjQAJsTJkdtYWeIanJ2hlOem4Qb3voOAR6EoRpunEBWzrt.7fqbiHWSaIAg6Q3rkmWIL7Zk8rsgTerBOlHwc6z9fV38wSA5Kov9osvmD1VHt9.dPKJMzA.U.SHKfJ6.mWkKfb.UUWDMTvAAmkK3yx5HZamDIWIc.SWg0ZD2WwDbmkCjjaZy3ThLEyxkv8mZbPIr3xOrh8mrsszQl.wCT3R.VtWppwYpFSBGQOQHiHgrORCfPZMvMVyIcIli2saWwaiCpbPEfMfEcT+Mgj8Qf8vVEhuCoWkKvqi2nDlzy6B86MtPScK3g0G6LF+K6iKuhs0mrsrH8JeAD4j+VEOEJ9kXmxtd30vi0gwJQ+94lWKA.X4NKKaKZXL8QqVpeOEz7frADjWlFj6x1nGJIALH22B52b54cay5o62R3xvAu947sa0bWuJM1MUUYOuKRSF8AHul5qbHZ4Gk3Ne5Bkm3dsXDGZxzPH7AgTmomIIwor1w0WOyU8xlaVay9N8qBEH5n8YUbIkKqr2zRArfehPQOk6nqFrruyF+XS86OSa55SoHLjJmoY8XI4WBnCeTzkTYIbRE18NB8pOb.f4SO.n37I+z1kBNJ3GwYpSGR4O0TKTVOldXQFqfvqRFU7SYiJxymHFLU3YlERvnDpmO78EUCHJBxnm4Va5tCerm6MdrZMZ355dVmD4lu6zW41Fja2QdXS0piCNqxt025OFLYj1U2C012lU6cqNpoJ3CIx0t7zWc4NiR72EgdyQMzAIix.6gczPpTwzIKiFzwvkEoS6rLaPiuVIFl3a1HDX9++gM3s4aNZ0I2KzQUMp30VN+YDofqNUQe9rWXpuHXTHQ8vqBz2+kY.JOdv7W8LVdLSMo38i+uc+v+VJ9byNLk+UyliKLCNBGMeM3X1spOyrY+9PyeNAWxr04ectBEACjTL9fiIJICNeMOYTTWX3kOEhNmCyYAcFKnajRk8zx5LPWJOHQ3ugeYFKqkMxLVdpQTDwWJdueZ6m9d6uMQCvIdxmrXAe6DHiuuayzzy0CEAeBw6880a+0fd6YiYi4.Sk4.ylyAledNvr0bfY64.yNeQL5ud6fQJQTZ6.nnSyjYRFFM4DnxJoJD8Or4D+2J

[ulrik]

@DanH works here, I'm on develop branch from Nov 15, 2022

[DanH]

@ulrik Thanks - yes worked on my other machine too, weird! Got round it by using fillRoundedRectangle with 0 corners...