nested for in loop scope convention

[ustk]

Is that normal to lose the scope of the element of the first loop when you are inside the inner one?
Well, I know the two workarounds to deal with this (either store it or use a counting loop), but is it normal behavior after all?

[d.healey]

This happens in Javascript too, it's annoying.

[ustk]

@d-healey @Christoph-Hart So perhaps Hise Script could handle it? This shouldn't break the backward compatibility, right?