HISE Logo Forum
    • Categories
    • Register
    • Login

    Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Scripting
    13 Posts 3 Posters 378 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • d.healeyD
      d.healey @VirtualVirgin
      last edited by

      @VirtualVirgin said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

      MIDI messages that arrive on the same sample

      How are you doing this?

      Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects
      My Patreon - HISE tutorials
      YouTube Channel - Public HISE tutorials

      VirtualVirginV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • VirtualVirginV
        VirtualVirgin @d.healey
        last edited by

        @d-healey said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

        @VirtualVirgin said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

        MIDI messages that arrive on the same sample

        How are you doing this?

        In this case, there is a simple test harmonizer in the snippet here that generates 5 notes from 1 note. If you are going to suggest delaying each generated note by a successive sample, that is a no-go.

        I am working on a voice exploder, which takes each note generated from any harmony input of 16 notes or less and sends each note to a different MIDI channel based on the sort method chosen.

        Harmonizer plugins, and quantized notation software or DAWs will produce multiple notes for a chord at the same sample.

        This particular utility I would like to build is to handle those use cases.

        You can listen to my orchestral mockups here:
        https://www.virtualvirgin.net/

        d.healeyD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • d.healeyD
          d.healey @VirtualVirgin
          last edited by

          @VirtualVirgin You're printing the notes in a loop which could be part of the issue. Instead use the script watch table to monitor the values in the array in realtime, or use Console.print(trace(myArr));

          Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects
          My Patreon - HISE tutorials
          YouTube Channel - Public HISE tutorials

          VirtualVirginV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • VirtualVirginV
            VirtualVirgin @d.healey
            last edited by VirtualVirgin

            @d-healey said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

            @VirtualVirgin You're printing the notes in a loop which could be part of the issue. Instead use the script watch table to monitor the values in the array in realtime, or use Console.print(trace(myArr));

            I don't think so.
            The print of the array length is outside of the loop, so the console should not be showing the print of the array length in between each print of the array contents.
            It should show all 5 prints of the length at the very end of console, and each should read as "5".
            (That is, if it were operating in parallel at each statement)

            You can listen to my orchestral mockups here:
            https://www.virtualvirgin.net/

            d.healeyD LindonL 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • d.healeyD
              d.healey @VirtualVirgin
              last edited by

              @VirtualVirgin Can you make a minimal snippet that demonstrates this?

              Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects
              My Patreon - HISE tutorials
              YouTube Channel - Public HISE tutorials

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • LindonL
                Lindon @VirtualVirgin
                last edited by

                @VirtualVirgin this is not how MIDI works - as the MIDI Spec 1.0 makes very plain - MIDI is a serial protocol, so the notes must follow each other and cannot arrive at the same time....

                HISE Development for hire.
                www.channelrobot.com

                VirtualVirginV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • VirtualVirginV
                  VirtualVirgin @Lindon
                  last edited by

                  @Lindon said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                  @VirtualVirgin this is not how MIDI works - as the MIDI Spec 1.0 makes very plain - MIDI is a serial protocol, so the notes must follow each other and cannot arrive at the same time....

                  I understand in theory the idea that that the MIDI messages are in serial.
                  If you generate notes for harmony, say using the Synth.addNoteOn() in HISE,
                  the order you generate them in the code will be the order they arise later on in a MIDI monitor, even if they are generated at the same sample. Note numbers generated out of sort order, say 74, 60, 77, will show up in the MIDI monitor later in that same order.

                  But in practice, the way I see it, MIDI messages that occur within the same sample are in some ways handled as if happening at the same time because a timestamp will read the same for all notes at that sample, and cannot be distinguished from using that information. So for time ID purposes they are the same.

                  MIDI from quantized DAWs, notation software and plugins generating harmonies will therefore return a time delta of "0" between messages in those vertical stacks (chords).

                  Screenshot 2024-11-10 at 12.17.09 PM.png

                  So not technically "at the same time", but from an ID perspective certainly categorized as the "at the same time" (timestamp).

                  Anyway, my question arises from trying to figure out how to handle MIDI messages occurring on the same sample when they need processing with a quick turnaround.
                  I'm sure you know a bit about it. I'll have some more questions later.

                  You can listen to my orchestral mockups here:
                  https://www.virtualvirgin.net/

                  d.healeyD LindonL 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • d.healeyD
                    d.healey @VirtualVirgin
                    last edited by

                    @VirtualVirgin said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                    but from an ID perspective

                    The event ID will always be unique.

                    Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects
                    My Patreon - HISE tutorials
                    YouTube Channel - Public HISE tutorials

                    VirtualVirginV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • VirtualVirginV
                      VirtualVirgin @d.healey
                      last edited by VirtualVirgin

                      @d-healey said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                      @VirtualVirgin said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                      but from an ID perspective

                      The event ID will always be unique.

                      "ID" here referring to the ID of the timestamp (0 samples difference), not the Event ID.

                      You can listen to my orchestral mockups here:
                      https://www.virtualvirgin.net/

                      d.healeyD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • d.healeyD
                        d.healey @VirtualVirgin
                        last edited by

                        @VirtualVirgin I'm suggesting you use the event ID to avoid clashes in your array. A minimal snippet would really help to understand exactly what the issue is and find a solution.

                        Libre Wave - Freedom respecting instruments and effects
                        My Patreon - HISE tutorials
                        YouTube Channel - Public HISE tutorials

                        VirtualVirginV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • VirtualVirginV
                          VirtualVirgin @d.healey
                          last edited by

                          @d-healey said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                          @VirtualVirgin I'm suggesting you use the event ID to avoid clashes in your array. A minimal snippet would really help to understand exactly what the issue is and find a solution.

                          Yes, I was thinking about using a combo of timestamp and Event ID for each note.

                          At the moment though my problem solving test has switched over to a different, but related conundrum. I'll put that in a different post in a few.

                          You can listen to my orchestral mockups here:
                          https://www.virtualvirgin.net/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • LindonL
                            Lindon @VirtualVirgin
                            last edited by

                            @VirtualVirgin said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                            @Lindon said in Is there a method to force parallelization of code processing?:

                            @VirtualVirgin this is not how MIDI works - as the MIDI Spec 1.0 makes very plain - MIDI is a serial protocol, so the notes must follow each other and cannot arrive at the same time....

                            I understand in theory the idea that that the MIDI messages are in serial.
                            If you generate notes for harmony, say using the Synth.addNoteOn() in HISE,
                            the order you generate them in the code will be the order they arise later on in a MIDI monitor, even if they are generated at the same sample. Note numbers generated out of sort order, say 74, 60, 77, will show up in the MIDI monitor later in that same order.

                            But in practice, the way I see it, MIDI messages that occur within the same sample are in some ways handled as if happening at the same time because a timestamp will read the same for all notes at that sample, and cannot be distinguished from using that information. So for time ID purposes they are the same.

                            MIDI from quantized DAWs, notation software and plugins generating harmonies will therefore return a time delta of "0" between messages in those vertical stacks (chords).

                            Screenshot 2024-11-10 at 12.17.09 PM.png

                            So not technically "at the same time", but from an ID perspective certainly categorized as the "at the same time" (timestamp).

                            Anyway, my question arises from trying to figure out how to handle MIDI messages occurring on the same sample when they need processing with a quick turnaround.
                            I'm sure you know a bit about it. I'll have some more questions later.

                            Yes, but no..... the MIDI spec says (if I remember correctly) that any receiving object needs only to act serially, so it can freely ignore the timestamp... so what you are doing is legal and accounted for - but no midi processor is required to process it in the same sample.... in fact given the laws of physics - they cant. - So it should come as no surprise when a midi processor of some sort (in this case HISE) doesnt behave the way you want.

                            HISE Development for hire.
                            www.channelrobot.com

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post

                            21

                            Online

                            1.8k

                            Users

                            12.0k

                            Topics

                            104.7k

                            Posts