Sampler table sorting resets on edit
-
Steps to reproduce:
In the sampler workspace click on the RR group heading to sort the list of samples by RR group.
Select a sample and make an adjustment in the sample editor, such as adjusting the start position.
Notice that the sampler table is no longer sorted by RR group. -
And another thing...
The search in the table editor used to act as a filter now it acts as a selector and the regex doesn't seem as useful.
For example search
dynamic3 close
used to bring up just samples with those two words in the name. Now it comes up empty and I have to search eitherdynamic3
orclose
separately.Can we get the old behaviour back please?
-
@d-healey said in Sampler table sorting resets on edit:
The search in the table editor used to act as a filter now it acts as a selector and the regex doesn't seem as useful.
For example search dynamic3 close used to bring up just samples with those two words in the name. Now it comes up empty and I have to search either dynamic3 or close separately.Not sure I understand. Do you want the table to just display the search matches instead of displaying them all and just highlighting the matches? Or is it how the regex actually behaves (so in this case you just need the logical or operator):
dynamic3|close
-
@Christoph-Hart
I can't remember how long ago, but it was sometime last year (and possibly early this year) the table only displayed the samples that matched the query. The current behaviour is it displays all of the samples and selects those that match the query. I preferred the previous behaviour.How would I select samples that match
dynamic1
and matchclose
? I trieddynamic1&close
but that didn't work. It used to be that I could usedynamic1 close
and it would display all samples that contained both of those phrases, although I like the idea of being able to use the operators better. -
dynamic3|close
-
@Christoph-Hart That selects samples that have
dynamic3
orclose
in their name, I want samples that havedynamic3
andclose
. -
Oops, I misread that. It seems that LOGICAL AND is super hard in Regex:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/469913/regular-expressions-is-there-an-and-operator
So... custom solution it is:
https://github.com/christophhart/HISE/commit/b7963e6653325b8af540d734d0fc790dbf288548
Now you can do:
display&close
-
@Christoph-Hart Thank you!