HISE Logo Forum
    • Categories
    • Register
    • Login

    Routing Matrix issue - no signal when returning send from an effect [solved]

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Questions
    4 Posts 2 Posters 423 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      andioak
      last edited by andioak

      Hello there HISE:rs. I got a little issue that might be a misconception of the construct of the audio paths on my part, but let me explain.

      I want a normal send-return to and from a Reverb plugin. So I got a few plugins going first, then I do this:

      1: first a few plugins...
      2: Routing Matrix #1 -- send (extra blue channels) from 1-2 to 3-4
      3: reverb plugin gets the signal by tapping into channels 3-4, so far so good.

      (since sending or "returning" the output of the reverb does not work, and we cannot route any channel to any other channel, via send or direct, I instead add the next plugin)

      4: Routing Matrix #2 -- this sends a parallel send back to cannel 1-2 from the 3-4, after the reverb is done giving it´s thing.
      5: No signal. Nothing is going into the channel 1-2 chain again. I want the output of the Reverb to go back into my channel 1-2 chain for summing through a limiter and final gain stage. Like any normal mixer procedure.

      Image of the scheme:

      Screen Shot 2020-11-02 at 01.16.43.png

      The image shows the first routing matrix sending using a "send", blue lines, from 1-2 to 3-4. Then "Reverb1" is using the channels 3-4 for adding reverb. But the return via the next Routing Matrix is not audible and does not give sound.

      Is it not possible to return the signal using my second Routing Matrix plugin?

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        andioak @andioak
        last edited by

        I found the solution to the issue. The returning signal did not have anything to hook into, as I was using only a send. That apparently does not hook into anything. You need the 3-4 from the Matrix plugin to go out to 3-4 of the container/bus/output too. Or there is nothing to tap into for the send:

        Screen Shot 2020-11-02 at 03.07.19.png

        Now I´m getting sound and can set up a send FX contra "dry signal" path, without leaving the container I´m in.

        LindonL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • LindonL
          Lindon @andioak
          last edited by

          @andioak routing matix is very powerful - but a pita most of the time - Lets hope @Christoph-Hart included the send/return buss fx I asked for in an up and coming version of HISE...:-)

          HISE Development for hire.
          www.channelrobot.com

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • A
            andioak @Lindon
            last edited by

            @Lindon said in Routing Matrix issue - no signal when returning send from an effect [solved]:

            @andioak routing matix is very powerful - but a pita most of the time - Lets hope @Christoph-Hart included the send/return buss fx I asked for in an up and coming version of HISE...:-)

            Yes, lets. But to redesign this one, the Routing Matrix, would be a good idea. The clarity of "taking from one stream" and "putting it into another stream" is lacking. My preference in routing is a origin and a destination. This case would be this to me, using 3 rows of connections instead of 2:

            1. input stream - choose a stream to tap into.
            2. routing matrix interconnection slot.
            3. destination output slot.

            Use:

            1. Connect "Container 1-2" to "Routing Matrix plugin input 1-2".
            2. direct / redirect "Routing Matrix plugin input 1-2" to output, for example "Container 3-4".

            We now directed the sound in one "beginning to end" path. Easy to understand. The current one is mysical and in that sense, dangerous for the listener of both hise and it´s intended output product.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post

            32

            Online

            1.7k

            Users

            11.9k

            Topics

            103.5k

            Posts