Sliderpack issue again

[crd]

[d.healey]

@crd Check that your index is correct.

[crd]

@d-healey Got it. I see what you mean.

local index = g_data1.getCurrentlyDisplayedIndex();

returns zero always when being triggered from the interface.

I'm surprised all the knobs don't then change the first parameter of the scriptFX?

Is there a better way to get the index?

[crd]

In other words, is something broken? Or am I doing something wrong in the code? Possibly both?

[d.healey]

@crd Something is broken but I don't think it's related to what you're doing, I think you have a code issue.

[crd]

@d-healey It works correctly if I call it in a loop like this:

HiseSnippet 1706.3oc6XEzaaTDEdWmroXSA0h3.RHgV4KrIM3XmzTnJfZRbRJQkjXZLQTUUUMd2w1CY8Lq1cbScQ4FG3W.+A5eBNxQNhDRvINvO.j3e.7dyrq2ccrCVtsbpVJNdl48dy27du46MyzHT3RihDgFlEaNHfZXdUqiGvkcq2kv3F6uig46YE4y7ngMHtm1TbraHKPxEdTisGDPhhndFllycWTZyhyan9722YahOg6RS6xv3DAyk9ErdLYZuM17dLe+8HdzlrdYj9latuqfWW3K5CHaNqpFAvrS5POjfhUvxvbgc8XRQ3wRhjFYXN+1BuAG2UbFWK+IrHVKeJ1nlwwfgzcumv2CQL1qQ8tLeuFIdfHCvJMR8Gyo8Guq0ALO1v9S8KWSMfcpFY8GlExCu4xAuZYgW0LvaLPZtLPxRCoqaoiBoif3on0c8EsH9Q4.xg86c7vvG.DKyBf+Uqug4uY0QoicmG6QjjZ1el8t7NLNshaHEP9Vbu6S6vhjzvTqrCHoSsE2ncetqjI31B9gBI8Htyhk91REKcdI6QGpc6wNVcAWFJ78ogicXLmH7xTzg2uWKZ3x1Og32mNTPHNl26aMYue1jCHkSR4xLBJ36yYxiBn7IkxXTWqD7quZezy.gLy39.4BngRFBAycnOAx+0AvhV6PiNUJBfc.oQ24urn6aZsOXyv1D27a7hijEVpfU7rVoG4T5dgPigZ3bqpUW1F9ZwMJUBVkQRviEZeJuUDDwe3ifdaKBscXPqpaXyr+T6aB+6F2P4RQwdH6QvXIy.wy6dbQKmxvPksugMaYav9rkVGlfhCUnRDUFGnpS78aAoNNBNNXbu.ZNOKdz7L3NcXtTrPU5Pk4194TNUnx3pgw8gz0r4FYl.GWQu.AGfb1TDegKjwy3dzmByCJdEUiiZmJOXZXgDuq.WHmfp6njKwVvrWDlnHgOsRPHiK0CqT87MJ85sG41dXNeLp.QkpD82NNQWyrXvf74ErfvQUCEdiqF7SOO3Otiwzpasb5Zu1Z+5zq6p4zcye7C9qoW20xoqwu+7e4NyDe.5khSAg3x+ke5oHeNNeCR9AvTGbL6YCWD+4y9NbQLslr1Hlb0WbSt5Hlz6E2jqMhI+gIYxokb8pVorJikc8CmeH6JvE74TVmtRmUGkOUK8decsrzW61tM0U5TVOnMLZ4Tsh7CpkmWMsLKR0ETqrhZUMQXyJgz1zvlBUM3X5owSChReozfShwuHLVwgKEb8tkTFxZ0WB7eKmbRAboEyItHx3cdoUVonBgtcI7NTOGE+3JKA+geFk1MiYp2OLDvl+fcXQA9jATu8QgbzbvSBIZl3KhFEErpLzD3lGEjEWZEjttTRP.QTh+JNFr33KkkwEmOQv0mBemKttceoTvcJqFBBpqVMNrp5.suSYVzAhdf7jvAfD0pnxutXjUowzFZuPj8h0zVtpdlJNhGaBQ5hWV5wX0oHldLYWr1kLAeb1EKL6P9DDtdco07kVKLrL07Zly2IGyIxlDydhorIkprLmCrBFuLLeeqZ2phWy0V+1eyC7ev5rmTkU6n0V+K6b6JFSrHnNmVY4qXoBT4qBp9LSUAKjoXvBSyR5hUBSkSwlfci8qI52pmnOOy8Pu1lWR4mwrLUl6myNcY16l8dvioDDbuQgWeehL+kIwaPGO.jokqJDdNddDSlyxuztg4zBwqa0fIc6NdLVXLXDSLeEfw36k+VV5Jqo.bdq895WQWB27h9nRVIjfwGgHs.+3NBg42akRiDDRCHgzlhFP4NmHRu.e58ALtrcKnJ4o34XtH2SfFBaiR3f0u3T+nYghZgo1qT6xCJ2WzWx3cNf.7+3NB7sFD8Cco0iQWxyMD2t5v8lTtmpw+.ehGrVxNTbvZICl450GRkmIBOUENh+MDLz99chBR5ZKeewY3lYVbVJDCT80P3OHnqfybwtzRjfzD9.MbMKbH99VlKrGwEbTCZPjcw7ejkFR1ng3wGhS5xM2owcUFE3SaPBI8nv0viz9SzvIOqk1W..omh0AeTq4vwU46o5guJURq3Erk0QbpwAL9IwL4VPIbiCHOcXa3vCF4Znne4TUNRtIXnIadl3kqIuhUytgzWx3bAq8Pm2KlMSq.o2Zis.hqB5.59QmfiBmVMwLPVw1Bwo8HpzuY6gd9+XyROhan3wt58+3h6MT8.4Ub06lVz5.rsc5Q.TNudLO1iccQFzOBNow30Y0YPm0lAct4Lny5yfN2ZFz4imAc9jKUG7ws1puTzSyUAczXWUxko4tbBPCqpgX7u.FXwRB

That doesn't seem nearly as efficient or clean as what I had before but... it works.

Is it a bug that .getCurrentDisplayedIndex() returns zero in this context?

(also, .getNumSliders seems to be broken as well.)

[d.healey]

@crd said in Sliderpack issue again:

Is it a bug that .getCurrentDisplayedIndex() returns zero in this context?

I'm not sure what that function's meant to do.

[d.healey]

@crd Regarding the index for your function, that's what the value parameter gives ;)

[ulrik]

@d-healey said in Sliderpack issue again:

@crd said in Sliderpack issue again:

Is it a bug that .getCurrentDisplayedIndex() returns zero in this context?

I'm not sure what that function's meant to do.

[d.healey]

@ulrik Yeah I read that. Still don't know what it does. All the sliders are displayed at once :)

[crd]

@d-healey Got it!

Thank you. That is what I was using .getCurrentDispayedIndex for which was incorrect.