Repaint panel or sliders on combobox callback

[d.healey]

@gorangrooves said in Repaint panel or sliders on combobox callback:

I know that Dave is a "freak" of that department

Working on it... :)

[ulrik]

@gorangrooves ok

[gorangrooves]

@ulrik I appreciate your help very much, regardless of what solution yield most practical results! Thank you.

[d.healey]

This is the problem

var PanState = PanStates[obj];

obj is not an index, so you will always get PanStates[0].

I can see a couple of possible solutions, but the thing that is really confusing me is why the laf function is retriggered when changing the combobox value... I added a button to the UI and pressing that also triggers the slider LAF function. Maybe it's always been this way but it seems weird to me.

Edit: Nope, I just made a test and this is definitely weird behaviour in your snippet. I need to figure out what's going on.

[gorangrooves]

@d-healey I am itching. I've been pouring over this for over a day now....

[d.healey]

@gorangrooves There is something very strange with your snippet and I can't figure it out. I'll make a new snippet.

[d.healey]

Ok here's a minimal example. I'm just colouring the sliders in a solid colour, you can fill in the blanks in the laf to do what you want.

There are a few ways to achieve the goal but I just discovered that we can now access the component ID in the obj within the laf function, I don't know when this was added so if it's not working for you you need to update HISE. But using it I think gives the cleanest approach.

HiseSnippet 1187.3ocsW01aZbDDdOaeIkqsQIp4yUm7mNjbH.NMspVsEaroEE+BJjZUojznk6VfsrrKZ2EanU9OT+00+Asyr2AbIFgsox9CV2ryaOyK6rCszpXlwnzDuBuY5HFw6K7aOUZ6WuOkKIMOj38H+SnFKSGldzASGQMFVBwyayeFOvqvVD2e+yOc.UPkwrEGQHmq3wri4C41Em1p1q3BQCZB6M7g4j9E0ZFqj0UB0X.Oa5WlLhFOf1icJEEaCeh2CNJgaU51VpkY.YNPkLsce0kxT4Oma3cDLjnBoMXnziI06yEIslEqFBwaqVKh7MSi7m5eBOgO+7EYfG6XDtPi74.uMVEjpbGfjWNHsUJjdhe6XMejcAGDOeteSITP5RgTcdnjJKYiuZK+5JPBoszP5.VCMPLWinWVt7Ngv+JtWP.jtM1vARUGAsa3ODNSsXMChliUwTwwJ0f8kIMXLQDpRlvkzrdbrsnwXYrkqjQamnoWdLWxn51BdBSu8Ngcmwr2NgpN+Qwf+JnvETcHWlvl.9CMVyDSIG8Yci.YJwS.23jxfoTPpX0vNpCTSXl25D78k5wrmSEiYQECeVXE.UN4iccNfxAELWxsw8CiblnXPAvuEhoFVX4uG9pPpjt.F+v.QSxdHiNPfO.sWpzUVtzc.WuLwqtbw6oYLYd4KbEhwdk5BWC1WHhR0n3dEBtBSwO+4tDiIW4ARRfAe662K2YlbELHg.FptZ3HkDnMQa+JPh28tjsQC1UoCil.Y8T8bkgYo9QiM8ilfFnYRTQL0OojgYuVsOqtCBbEfcDitxRXGrtjgpEEpUBs5Yhcc3sv.EyvAZEsRTmJDcfgAQJ4LYx3fHNfKEPi271svqIEjhy7+NgWfcNtbf.Cx4MiKb979w4Zgdwk6l0AZXxjWyFAiHrm.2LggT3siqxgfSUV1YxHmiBtJH7SY0s6R4kAXASuT13DS8pTLRNdXGlNeXhBBiT934TO31MmJNsJlSPkrojaOaDKitgRjfyevuu9TMRVa.LeayLDBeYcS2db1zsY8CDdBNbaFYEhKDx+.C4NZhp++MwtKwD+ZyCoVJNxNK5fHdDSa4Xh06P1EvadoCvK3eHyLvpFAI74WAHdOL00OJy0oyKcN9g93E2JjIDOeumBta5BO+i0L1oB2az+hRy+Sv2TAAF616Ptl45C9DdF5ErlxVZFbSBegfjCCO3FvP0TL722FLrJ+bSw5to9olmyO9deM3k6g37Fa1ljeQjbQ7uWaH0gvMABtkMzfHuRP0fcI2c+TMmepwt+7yt4iG6s1OWeEDX4GUxXA09waDgq9kw.KG4WCAW0PZ31o4uybGVSp7JWS51Bwm32BWAX4XbikfQ3578AFyVt7K8OpaWn2cA.2xuwustaRdCt+0pwVtr2ITqlik5SGOrMrfQLC7tTxDFr7uANbNktLRiYf1vqZNh+E9KiYEj1KiYkYLICowZ0GhSGlhqu9YtS.LIcaqW.9YC.c37o399kKUlLD1j9CwwX3+L38hkqS00PmcWCcdwZny2rF57x0PmucMz46VoN3OhY+wV0vzqCvAsNx8Nlm2QRJzY45BI+GngGjOC

[gorangrooves]

@d-healey thank you very much! I'll investigate that thoroughly and report back (on successful results, i hope).

[gorangrooves]

@d-healey @ulrik Thank you both so very much! Both of your solutions work very well.

@ulrik I didn't see your latest simplified version at first. While I was taking a break, I was thinking of a possible solution if I wouldn't be able to iterate through the index within LAF. I thought about creating multiple LAFs within a loop. Then, when I opened your latest script, I saw that you did that

Thank you!

[ulrik]

@gorangrooves my pleasure