Collaborative project!

[hisefilo]

@ustk forgot to ask. Leslie. can be faster than 1?

[lalalandsynth]

@hisefilo The 122 Leslie model has dual speeds .
The previous model only has one speed .

[hisefilo]

@lalalandsynth so there's an easy way to make it faster? or u need to re build it ? Just changing the freq of the oscillator may work?

[hisefilo]

@Lindon LOL no need to be against us. Just join us :) I think this will be also a good way to show your brand!

Edit: AAX and installer is pending :)

[lalalandsynth]

@hisefilo said in Collaborative project!:

Just changing the freq of the oscillator may work?

That should work

[lalalandsynth]

New version . Probably will skip the top panel knob additions.
Drawbars a little chubby , need to fix that.

EDIT> Actually , got an idea , for reverb will we be using an impulse ?
So a spring reverb ?
Working on it

Maybe change the image when the reverb is engaged. Assuming there will be a reverb.

And with Leslie.

And I am taking a break :)

[ustk]

@hisefilo Ok so that's what I thought. Filtering a noise with high Q bands could give good results.
As for the Leslie speed, ye of course. In fact when I re-implemented it in this project I divided thE hi speed by two because of an issue.
I can put it back to original speed, and better, I can add a low speed setting, hi speed, and transition time... And a proper stop because at the moment it's just a bypass...

[hisefilo]

Morning guys! I'm back. Unplugged for the weekend.
I've jus pushed a new version with leakage and re-built the main timbre. @ustk how can I do to copy Leslie to the new .xml I've created??? Or.... if you can just plug it once again??

[hisefilo]

@hisefilo @ustk Nevermind, I did it :)

[ustk]

@hisefilo Yep I wanted to ask, haven't you pull/fetch the git? If you did, no problem

[hisefilo]

@ustk :) Just pull again. Pushed a new one Need some opinion about timbre, leakage. Also Leslie speed can be done???

[hisefilo]

@ustk the guy is Hammond-B3-002.xml

[ustk]

@hisefilo Cool :) I'm on the speed thing, probably for tomorrow ;)

[hisefilo]

@ustk awesome!!!

[hisefilo]

@ustk https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/doppler/doppler.pdf super-interesting!

[ustk]

@hisefilo that's the one I have (partly) read. But honestly the maths are too hard for me so I just guessed and applied the main principles

[hisefilo]

@ustk awesome!!!!!

[ustk]

@hisefilo what I don't like in my Leslie attempt is the strong tone change it applies on the signal. Well in real life I guess it does the same, but I don't know if it's a good thing with your simulation. We have to take care not to apply the same correction twice
The second thing it the CPU, I can't find a way to remove or just apply the frame node only where it's needed so there's no glitch

[hisefilo]

@ustk said in Collaborative project!:

what I don't like in my Leslie attempt is the strong tone change it applies on the signal.

I agree. Is doing something that changes it too much. It enhances lower harmonics in some way. Will do a comparison on Apple's Leslie to see dif

[ustk]

@hisefilo And cut too much of the highs...