HISE Logo Forum
    • Categories
    • Register
    • Login

    Show and Tell

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Questions
    26 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FrankbeatF
      Frankbeat
      last edited by

      This post is deleted!
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • FrankbeatF
        Frankbeat
        last edited by

        This article might be a good read on that matter: http://www.muzique.com/clones.htm

        CyberGenC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • CyberGenC
          CyberGen @Frankbeat
          last edited by CyberGen

          @Frankbeat Hi, thanks this is an interesting article.

          Sorry for my friend's cut and dry approach. I don't mean to be rude.

          See, I'm hoping to do something similar myself one day. That is the reason why I'm researching it.

          I don't think the problem is related to schematics or circuitry at all. After all, what we are doing in software is well, ones and zeros and it's not analog. So as far as I am concern they are totally different things.

          I think the weakness is in the design of the user interface. I can easily see a company claiming they own the design of the user interface, as some elements are indeed artistic in nature and the general composition of those elements can also be viewed as IP and as such can be copyright protected.

          Something else to consider is that there is probably a statute of limitations for such copyright, you might be able to copy an 808 as its design is over 40 years old. But something more recent can be trickier.

          Here is a different article I found on the subject.
          https://www.tasanet.com/Knowledge-Center/Articles/ArtMID/477/ArticleID/913419/How-to-Protect-Your-User-Interface-Intellectual-Property

          Thanks for your response.

          FrankbeatF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • FrankbeatF
            Frankbeat @CyberGen
            last edited by Frankbeat

            @RastaChess You don’t need to be sorry… You ( and your buddy) were not offensive. It’s an interesting topic!

            I don‘t think we have to distinguish between analog or digital processing. Yes, an 808 schematic is comparably old but that doesn’t mean, it’s unrelated to the issue we discuss. For a computational process, the same principle might apply: is the functionality you‘re about to copy really one that can be perceived special? For example: Is a instrument mixing a decaying sine tone with a single pulse to form something like a bass drum? Cool feature then, maybe. But how unique do you think this would be to a person who is deciding on granting patents for quite some years? I‘m only guessing though.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FrankbeatF
              Frankbeat
              last edited by

              Well, I have to add as a side note: I‘m not the best person to have a valuable debate about these concerns because I don’t plan to sell plug-ins ever. My excitement ends at the point I can make my own plug-ins. I could blatantly replicate anything just the way I like (of course, limited by my abilities) 😂

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FrankbeatF
                Frankbeat
                last edited by

                Sharing a horizontal slider I sampled from my old Grundig radio:

                frankbeat-horizontal-sliders.png

                frankbeat-horizontal-sliders.zip

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • First post
                  Last post

                6

                Online

                1.7k

                Users

                11.8k

                Topics

                102.4k

                Posts