<![CDATA[1 script FX vs. multiple script FX]]>I'm wondering if there is a performance and cpu load difference between using 1 vs multiple script Fx.

Here is the situation.

method 1:
I want to control gain, width, and filter using script FX. (Actually I have more than 150 parameters to control in my drum sampler). I can make a chain and put all of these into a single script FX.

method 2:
I can separate all these(gain, width,filter vs.) into 3 different script FX and get job done again.( this method is more easier to control and check for me.)

I'm wondering will there be a performance difference between these methods?

]]>https://forum.hise.audio/topic/6209/1-script-fx-vs-multiple-script-fxRSS for NodeMon, 07 Sep 2026 15:00:50 GMTTue, 23 Aug 2022 18:06:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 1 script FX vs. multiple script FX on Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:12:44 GMT]]>Yes there‘s a bit of overhead involved if you use 150 effects vs 50, so yeah I would make the latter. From my experience it‘s also better from a development workflow perspective to coallascate things like this into as few modules as possible.

]]>https://forum.hise.audio/post/53910https://forum.hise.audio/post/53910Wed, 24 Aug 2022 08:12:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 1 script FX vs. multiple script FX on Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:18:39 GMT]]>I'm not certain but I don't think there will be a noticeable difference, and putting 150 parameters in a single effect sounds unpleasant.

]]>https://forum.hise.audio/post/53904https://forum.hise.audio/post/53904Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:18:39 GMT